NameTides

Alondra

Alondra was the #680 girls' name in the US in 2025 (417 babies).

Alondra as a girl’s name

  • US
  • England & Wales
  • Ireland
  • Canada
Alondra as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, Ireland, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Ireland, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.511.5218801900192019401960198020002020US
Alondra as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, Ireland, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Ireland, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.511.521880192019602000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.
Show the numbers
YearUSEngland & WalesIrelandCanada
2025#680 (417)———
2024#583 (517)———
2023#524 (579)———
2022#510 (618)———
2021#524 (589)———
2020#520 (582)——#2,591 (7)
2019#508 (620)#5,591 (3)#871 (3)—
2018#457 (690)———
2017#368 (847)#5,765 (3)—#3,307 (5)
2016#392 (846)——#2,892 (6)
2015#350 (947)———
2014#358 (915)——#2,617 (7)
2013#321 (1,019)——#3,286 (5)
2012#282 (1,128)———
2011#251 (1,274)——#2,348 (8)

The tide so far

  • Peaked in the US in 2005 at #120.
  • Falling over the last five years.
  • First recorded in the US in 1959.

How common is it?

about 1 in 3,900 baby girls in the published US list for 2025.

In a group of 1,000 children born that year, you would expect to meet fewer than 1. How we work this out.

Next year

On its recent trend, Alondra is likely to hold steady in the US in 2026: about 1 in 3,900 baby girls. Likely range 1 in 3,200 to 1 in 4,600.

Estimate, not an official figure. How we estimate.

Across the US

Alondra by state, 2025Alaska: fewer than 5 babiesAKMaine: fewer than 5 babiesMEWisconsin: #700WIVermont: fewer than 5 babiesVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 babiesNHWashington: #732WAIdaho: fewer than 5 babiesIDMontana: fewer than 5 babiesMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 babiesNDMinnesota: #731MNIllinois: #484ILMichigan: fewer than 5 babiesMINew York: #1,165NYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 babiesMAOregon: #320ORNevada: #374NVWyoming: fewer than 5 babiesWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 babiesSDIowa: fewer than 5 babiesIAIndiana: fewer than 5 babiesINOhio: fewer than 5 babiesOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 babiesPANew Jersey: #774NJConnecticut: fewer than 5 babiesCTRhode Island: fewer than 5 babiesRICalifornia: #388CAUtah: #704UTColorado: #536CONebraska: fewer than 5 babiesNEMissouri: fewer than 5 babiesMOKentucky: fewer than 5 babiesKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 babiesWVVirginia: #936VAMaryland: fewer than 5 babiesMDDelaware: fewer than 5 babiesDEArizona: #416AZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 babiesNMKansas: fewer than 5 babiesKSArkansas: fewer than 5 babiesARTennessee: #813TNNorth Carolina: #729NCSouth Carolina: #560SCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 babiesDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 babiesOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 babiesLAMississippi: fewer than 5 babiesMSAlabama: #716ALGeorgia: #676GAHawaii: fewer than 5 babiesHITexas: #372TXFlorida: #674FL
Alondra (girls) rank in each state, 2025. Hatched states recorded fewer than 5 babies.
  • #1–10
  • #11–50
  • #51–100
  • #101–500
  • below #500

Spellings

Official statistics count each spelling separately, so we show them side by side rather than adding them up.

SpellingWhereSexLatest rankBabies
AlondraCanadaGirls—too few
AlondraEngland & WalesGirls—too few
AlondraIrelandGirls—too few
AlondraUSGirls#680417
AlondraUSBoys—too few