NameTides

Amila

Amila was the #2,354 girls' name in the US in 2025 (77 babies), and #2,440 in England & Wales.

Amila as a girl’s name

  • US
  • England & Wales
  • Canada
Amila as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.050.10.150.218801900192019401960198020002020USEngland & Wales
Amila as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.050.10.150.21880192019602000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.
Show the numbers
YearUSEngland & WalesCanada
2025#2,354 (77)#2,440 (11)—
2024#2,231 (84)#3,696 (6)—
2023#1,837 (109)#2,689 (9)#1,582 (14)
2022#2,228 (84)#2,325 (11)—
2021#1,980 (98)#2,201 (12)#2,893 (6)
2020#1,841 (106)#2,843 (8)—
2019#1,919 (103)#4,001 (5)—
2018#1,937 (102)#2,674 (9)—
2017#2,779 (61)#2,706 (9)—
2016#3,182 (51)#2,757 (9)—
2015#2,964 (58)#3,615 (6)—
2014#4,544 (31)#2,203 (12)#2,905 (6)
2013#4,422 (32)#3,536 (6)—
2012#4,601 (31)#4,838 (4)—
2011#5,358 (25)#4,764 (4)—

The tide so far

  • Peaked in the US in 2023 at #1,837.
  • Falling over the last five years.
  • First recorded in the US in 1995.

How common is it?

about 1 in 21,000 baby girls in the published US list for 2025.

In a group of 1,000 children born that year, you would expect to meet fewer than 1. How we work this out.

How common, country by country

WhereSexLatest yearShareVerdict
USGirls2025about 1 in 21,000rare
England & WalesGirls2025about 1 in 23,000rare

Next year

On its recent trend, Amila is likely to hold steady in the US in 2026: about 1 in 21,000 baby girls. Likely range 1 in 16,000 to 1 in 27,000.

Estimate, not an official figure. How we estimate.

Across the US

Amila by state, 2025Alaska: fewer than 5 babiesAKMaine: fewer than 5 babiesMEWisconsin: fewer than 5 babiesWIVermont: fewer than 5 babiesVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 babiesNHWashington: fewer than 5 babiesWAIdaho: fewer than 5 babiesIDMontana: fewer than 5 babiesMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 babiesNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 babiesMNIllinois: fewer than 5 babiesILMichigan: fewer than 5 babiesMINew York: fewer than 5 babiesNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 babiesMAOregon: fewer than 5 babiesORNevada: fewer than 5 babiesNVWyoming: fewer than 5 babiesWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 babiesSDIowa: fewer than 5 babiesIAIndiana: fewer than 5 babiesINOhio: fewer than 5 babiesOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 babiesPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 babiesNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 babiesCTRhode Island: fewer than 5 babiesRICalifornia: #1,575CAUtah: fewer than 5 babiesUTColorado: fewer than 5 babiesCONebraska: fewer than 5 babiesNEMissouri: fewer than 5 babiesMOKentucky: fewer than 5 babiesKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 babiesWVVirginia: fewer than 5 babiesVAMaryland: fewer than 5 babiesMDDelaware: fewer than 5 babiesDEArizona: fewer than 5 babiesAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 babiesNMKansas: fewer than 5 babiesKSArkansas: fewer than 5 babiesARTennessee: fewer than 5 babiesTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 babiesNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 babiesSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 babiesDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 babiesOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 babiesLAMississippi: fewer than 5 babiesMSAlabama: fewer than 5 babiesALGeorgia: fewer than 5 babiesGAHawaii: fewer than 5 babiesHITexas: #2,636TXFlorida: fewer than 5 babiesFL
Amila (girls) rank in each state, 2025. Hatched states recorded fewer than 5 babies.
  • #1–10
  • #11–50
  • #51–100
  • #101–500
  • below #500

Spellings

Official statistics count each spelling separately, so we show them side by side rather than adding them up.

SpellingWhereSexLatest rankBabies
AmilaCanadaGirls—too few
AmilaEngland & WalesGirls#2,44011
AmilaNorthern IrelandGirls—too few
AmilaUSGirls#2,35477