Anabell peaked in the US in 2013 at #2,032, and is too rare now to appear in the latest official lists.
Anabell as a girl’s name Share of babies Rank
Anabell as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales Babies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. 0 0.03 0.05 0.08 0.1 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 Anabell as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales Babies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. 0 0.03 0.05 0.08 0.1 1880 1920 1960 2000 Anabell as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales Official rank (1 = most popular, log scale), 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. #1 #10 #100 #1,000 #10K #100K 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 Anabell as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales Official rank (1 = most popular, log scale), 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. #1 #10 #100 #1,000 #10K #100K 1880 1920 1960 2000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Official rank; #1 at the top. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.Show the numbers Year US England & Wales 2024 #15,293 (5) — 2023 #8,486 (12) — 2022 #12,243 (7) — 2021 #13,464 (6) — 2020 #9,546 (10) — 2019 #7,342 (15) — 2018 #9,151 (11) #3,518 (6) 2017 #5,338 (24) #5,765 (3) 2016 #4,531 (31) #3,609 (6) 2015 #3,915 (38) #3,615 (6) 2014 #2,194 (86) #3,160 (7) 2013 #2,032 (95) #3,160 (7) 2012 #2,336 (80) #4,171 (5) 2011 #2,258 (83) #4,764 (4) 2010 #2,360 (80) —
The tide so far Peaked in the US in 2013 at #2,032. First recorded in the US in 1922.