NameTides

Aneeqa

Aneeqa peaked in England & Wales in 1998 at #1,165, and is too rare now to appear in the latest official lists.

Aneeqa as a girl’s name

  • US
  • England & Wales
  • Canada
Aneeqa as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.030.050.080.118801900192019401960198020002020
Aneeqa as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.030.050.080.11880192019602000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.
Show the numbers
YearUSEngland & WalesCanada
2020—#4,535 (4)—
2019—#3,541 (6)—
2016—#4,763 (4)—
2015—#2,705 (9)—
2014—#2,659 (9)—
2013—#3,536 (6)—
2012—#2,338 (11)—
2011—#1,903 (14)#3,310 (5)
2010#14,959 (6)#1,731 (16)—
2009—#2,019 (12)—
2008—#1,641 (16)—
2007—#1,573 (16)—
2006—#2,509 (8)—
2005—#1,796 (12)—
2004—#2,112 (9)—

The tide so far

  • Peaked in England & Wales in 1998 at #1,165.
  • In the England & Wales records since the data begins in 1996.

Spellings

Official statistics count each spelling separately, so we show them side by side rather than adding them up.

SpellingWhereSexLatest rankBabies
AneeqaCanadaGirls—too few
AneeqaEngland & WalesGirls—too few
AneeqaNorthern IrelandGirls—too few
AneeqaUSGirls—too few