Angell

Angell peaked in the US in 1980 at #4,148, and is too rare now to appear in the latest official lists.

Angell as a girl’s name

  • US
  • England & Wales
Angell as a girl’s name, US, England & WalesBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.010.010.020.0218801900192019401960198020002020
Angell as a girl’s name, US, England & WalesBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.010.010.020.021880192019602000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.
Show the numbers
YearUSEngland & Wales
2024#15,293 (5)—
2017#11,615 (8)—
2015#8,931 (12)—
2012#16,869 (5)—
2011#12,153 (8)—
2009#9,975 (11)—
2008#9,476 (12)—
2007#9,539 (12)—
2006#13,606 (7)—
2005#13,010 (7)#4,798 (3)
2004#8,259 (13)—
2003#10,425 (9)—
2002#6,129 (18)—
2001#6,956 (15)—
2000#15,031 (5)—

Angell as a boy’s name

  • US
Angell as a boy’s name, USBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.000.010.010.0118801900192019401960198020002020
Angell as a boy’s name, USBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.000.010.010.011880192019602000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.
Show the numbers
YearUS
2021#12,146 (5)
2018#12,156 (5)
2017#10,775 (6)
2015#8,744 (8)
2014#12,108 (5)
2012#8,864 (8)
2010#12,231 (5)
2009#7,236 (11)
2008#12,553 (5)
2007#5,901 (14)
2006#8,732 (8)
2005#5,875 (13)
2004#6,138 (12)
2003#5,558 (13)
2002#8,456 (7)

The tide so far

  • Peaked in the US in 1980 at #4,148.
  • First recorded in the US in 1955.
  • In 2017, 57% of US babies named Angell were girls.