NameTides

Bexley

Bexley was the #960 girls' name in the US in 2025 (268 babies), and #3,044 in Canada.

Bexley as a girl’s name

  • US
  • England & Wales
  • Canada
Bexley as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.060.130.190.2518801900192019401960198020002020USCanada
Bexley as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.060.130.190.251880192019602000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.
Show the numbers
YearUSEngland & WalesCanada
2025#960 (268)—#3,044 (6)
2024#1,128 (214)—#2,975 (6)
2023#1,055 (237)—#1,678 (13)
2022#888 (314)—#1,989 (10)
2021#752 (378)#3,961 (5)#1,286 (19)
2020#840 (325)—#1,020 (25)
2019#951 (278)—#1,342 (18)
2018#908 (296)#2,901 (8)#1,089 (23)
2017#925 (286)#2,925 (8)#1,333 (18)
2016#973 (276)#5,785 (3)#1,157 (22)
2015#1,215 (204)#5,730 (3)#1,874 (11)
2014#2,714 (64)—#2,905 (6)
2013#2,973 (56)——
2012#6,576 (19)——
2011#10,374 (10)——

The tide so far

  • Peaked in the US in 2021 at #752.
  • Holding steady over the last five years.
  • First recorded in the US in 2009.
  • In 2025, 95% of US babies named Bexley were girls.

How common is it?

about 1 in 6,000 baby girls in the published US list for 2025.

In a group of 1,000 children born that year, you would expect to meet fewer than 1. How we work this out.

How common, country by country

WhereSexLatest yearShareVerdict
USGirls2025about 1 in 6,000uncommon
CanadaGirls2025about 1 in 25,000rare

Next year

On its recent trend, Bexley is likely to keep falling in the US in 2026: about 1 in 7,900 baby girls. Likely range 1 in 5,700 to 1 in 11,000.

Estimate, not an official figure. How we estimate.

Across the US

Bexley by state, 2025Alaska: fewer than 5 babiesAKMaine: fewer than 5 babiesMEWisconsin: fewer than 5 babiesWIVermont: fewer than 5 babiesVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 babiesNHWashington: fewer than 5 babiesWAIdaho: fewer than 5 babiesIDMontana: fewer than 5 babiesMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 babiesNDMinnesota: #731MNIllinois: #1,014ILMichigan: #735MINew York: fewer than 5 babiesNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 babiesMAOregon: fewer than 5 babiesORNevada: fewer than 5 babiesNVWyoming: fewer than 5 babiesWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 babiesSDIowa: #565IAIndiana: #444INOhio: #371OHPennsylvania: #871PANew Jersey: fewer than 5 babiesNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 babiesCTRhode Island: fewer than 5 babiesRICalifornia: fewer than 5 babiesCAUtah: #490UTColorado: fewer than 5 babiesCONebraska: #296NEMissouri: #589MOKentucky: #443KYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 babiesWVVirginia: #1,037VAMaryland: fewer than 5 babiesMDDelaware: fewer than 5 babiesDEArizona: fewer than 5 babiesAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 babiesNMKansas: #445KSArkansas: #376ARTennessee: #645TNNorth Carolina: #1,138NCSouth Carolina: #773SCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 babiesDCOklahoma: #483OKLouisiana: #776LAMississippi: #441MSAlabama: fewer than 5 babiesALGeorgia: #1,358GAHawaii: fewer than 5 babiesHITexas: #1,154TXFlorida: #1,170FL
Bexley (girls) rank in each state, 2025. Hatched states recorded fewer than 5 babies.
  • #1–10
  • #11–50
  • #51–100
  • #101–500
  • below #500

Spellings

Official statistics count each spelling separately, so we show them side by side rather than adding them up.

SpellingWhereSexLatest rankBabies
BexleyCanadaGirls#3,0446
BexleyEngland & WalesGirls—too few
BexleyEngland & WalesBoys—too few
BexleyUSGirls#960268
BexleyUSBoys#6,14314