NameTides

Blayke

Blayke was the #2,076 girls' name in the US in 2025 (90 babies), and #5,927 in England & Wales and #2,131 in Canada.

Blayke as a girl’s name

  • US
  • England & Wales
  • Scotland
  • Canada
Blayke as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, Scotland, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Scotland, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.130.250.380.518801900192019401960198020002020ScotlandCanadaUSEngland & Wales
Blayke as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, Scotland, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Scotland, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.130.250.380.51880192019602000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.
Show the numbers
YearUSEngland & WalesScotlandCanada
2025#2,076 (90)#5,927 (3)#780 (3)#2,131 (10)
2024#2,178 (87)—#638 (4)#1,541 (15)
2023#1,813 (111)—#749 (3)#1,044 (24)
2022#1,518 (142)#4,646 (4)#625 (4)#1,095 (23)
2021#1,416 (153)#4,634 (4)#558 (5)#1,153 (22)
2020#1,389 (157)——#683 (42)
2019#1,203 (194)#4,001 (5)#447 (7)#676 (44)
2018#1,506 (145)#3,178 (7)—#752 (38)
2017#1,210 (198)#4,763 (4)#666 (4)#597 (51)
2016#1,815 (114)——#1,230 (20)
2015#3,024 (56)——#1,874 (11)
2014#3,549 (44)——#1,786 (12)
2013#3,465 (45)——#1,686 (13)
2012#4,121 (36)——#1,248 (20)
2011#3,781 (40)——#3,310 (5)

Blayke as a boy’s name

  • US
  • England & Wales
  • Scotland
  • Canada
Blayke as a boy’s name, US, England & Wales, Scotland, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Scotland, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.050.10.150.218801900192019401960198020002020England & WalesUS
Blayke as a boy’s name, US, England & Wales, Scotland, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Scotland, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.050.10.150.21880192019602000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.
Show the numbers
YearUSEngland & WalesScotlandCanada
2025#9,714 (7)#5,137 (3)——
2024#6,199 (14)———
2023#7,289 (11)———
2022#7,262 (11)#2,756 (7)#703 (3)—
2021#5,776 (15)#2,125 (10)——
2020#5,451 (16)#4,608 (3)#711 (3)—
2019#5,153 (18)#2,728 (7)——
2018#7,136 (11)#4,749 (3)——
2017#3,993 (26)#3,449 (5)——
2016#4,776 (20)#4,810 (3)——
2015#5,289 (17)#3,908 (4)—#2,715 (5)
2014#4,014 (25)#3,895 (4)——
2013#3,339 (32)———
2012#2,954 (39)#3,039 (6)——
2011#3,306 (33)#3,830 (4)——

The tide so far

  • Peaked in the US in 2019 at #1,203.
  • Falling over the last five years.
  • First recorded in the US in 1989.
  • In 2025, 93% of US babies named Blayke were girls.

How common is it?

about 1 in 18,000 baby girls in the published US list for 2025.

In a group of 1,000 children born that year, you would expect to meet fewer than 1. How we work this out.

How common, country by country

WhereSexLatest yearShareVerdict
USGirls2025about 1 in 18,000rare
England & WalesGirls2025about 1 in 83,000rare
ScotlandGirls2025about 1 in 6,000uncommon
CanadaGirls2025about 1 in 15,000rare
USBoys2025about 1 in 250,000rare
England & WalesBoys2025about 1 in 91,000rare

Next year

On its recent trend, Blayke is likely to keep falling in the US in 2026: about 1 in 22,000 baby girls. Likely range 1 in 19,000 to 1 in 26,000.

Estimate, not an official figure. How we estimate.

Across the US

Blayke by state, 2025Alaska: fewer than 5 babiesAKMaine: fewer than 5 babiesMEWisconsin: fewer than 5 babiesWIVermont: fewer than 5 babiesVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 babiesNHWashington: fewer than 5 babiesWAIdaho: fewer than 5 babiesIDMontana: fewer than 5 babiesMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 babiesNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 babiesMNIllinois: fewer than 5 babiesILMichigan: fewer than 5 babiesMINew York: fewer than 5 babiesNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 babiesMAOregon: fewer than 5 babiesORNevada: fewer than 5 babiesNVWyoming: fewer than 5 babiesWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 babiesSDIowa: fewer than 5 babiesIAIndiana: #1,032INOhio: #1,438OHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 babiesPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 babiesNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 babiesCTRhode Island: fewer than 5 babiesRICalifornia: #3,095CAUtah: fewer than 5 babiesUTColorado: fewer than 5 babiesCONebraska: fewer than 5 babiesNEMissouri: fewer than 5 babiesMOKentucky: fewer than 5 babiesKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 babiesWVVirginia: fewer than 5 babiesVAMaryland: fewer than 5 babiesMDDelaware: fewer than 5 babiesDEArizona: fewer than 5 babiesAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 babiesNMKansas: fewer than 5 babiesKSArkansas: fewer than 5 babiesARTennessee: fewer than 5 babiesTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 babiesNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 babiesSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 babiesDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 babiesOKLouisiana: #677LAMississippi: fewer than 5 babiesMSAlabama: fewer than 5 babiesALGeorgia: fewer than 5 babiesGAHawaii: fewer than 5 babiesHITexas: #1,902TXFlorida: fewer than 5 babiesFL
Blayke (girls) rank in each state, 2025. Hatched states recorded fewer than 5 babies.
  • #1–10
  • #11–50
  • #51–100
  • #101–500
  • below #500

Spellings

Official statistics count each spelling separately, so we show them side by side rather than adding them up.

SpellingWhereSexLatest rankBabies
BlaykeCanadaGirls#2,13110
BlaykeCanadaBoys—too few
BlaykeEngland & WalesGirls#5,9273
BlaykeEngland & WalesBoys#5,1373
BlaykeNorthern IrelandGirls—too few
BlaykeScotlandGirls#7803
BlaykeScotlandBoys—too few
BlaykeUSGirls#2,07690
BlaykeUSBoys#9,7147