NameTides

Brittaney

Brittaney peaked in the US in 1989 at #583, and is too rare now to appear in the latest official lists.

Brittaney as a girl’s name

  • US
  • England & Wales
  • Canada
Brittaney as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.060.130.190.2518801900192019401960198020002020
Brittaney as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.060.130.190.251880192019602000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.
Show the numbers
YearUSEngland & WalesCanada
2015#16,419 (5)——
2013#16,547 (5)——
2011#12,153 (8)——
2010#10,451 (10)——
2009#15,242 (6)——
2008#7,408 (17)——
2007#9,007 (13)——
2006#15,152 (6)——
2005#5,999 (20)——
2004#8,259 (13)——
2003#6,299 (18)——
2002#5,086 (23)——
2001#3,940 (32)——
2000#3,169 (43)#3,912 (3)#2,186 (6)
1999#1,753 (91)#1,970 (8)—

The tide so far

  • Peaked in the US in 1989 at #583.
  • First recorded in the US in 1978.

Spellings

Official statistics count each spelling separately, so we show them side by side rather than adding them up.

SpellingWhereSexLatest rankBabies
BrittaneyCanadaGirls—too few
BrittaneyEngland & WalesGirls—too few
BrittaneyUSGirls—too few