Burnell peaked in the US in 1920 at #816, and is too rare now to appear in the latest official lists.
Burnell as a boy’s name
US
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list.Official rank; #1 at the top. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.Show the numbers
Year
US
2022
#12,330 (5)
2020
#12,022 (5)
2017
#12,246 (5)
2016
#12,185 (5)
2013
#7,537 (10)
2011
#9,600 (7)
2010
#9,693 (7)
2006
#10,662 (6)
2004
#8,143 (8)
2003
#10,894 (5)
2001
#10,556 (5)
2000
#10,349 (5)
1999
#5,317 (12)
1998
#5,159 (12)
1996
#6,496 (8)
Burnell as a girl’s name
US
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list.Official rank; #1 at the top. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.Show the numbers
Year
US
1964
#6,009 (6)
1963
#6,592 (5)
1961
#6,567 (5)
1958
#6,103 (5)
1957
#4,202 (9)
1955
#3,778 (10)
1954
#4,278 (8)
1953
#3,480 (11)
1952
#2,806 (15)
1951
#4,833 (6)
1949
#3,892 (8)
1948
#3,593 (9)
1947
#4,345 (7)
1946
#4,417 (6)
1945
#3,132 (9)
The tide so far
Peaked in the US in 1920 at #816.
First recorded in the US in 1906.
In 1964, 20% of US babies named Burnell were girls.