Burns peaked in the US in 1891 at #841, and is too rare now to appear in the latest official lists.
Burns as a boy’s name Share of babies Rank
Burns as a boy’s name, US Babies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. 0 0.03 0.05 0.08 0.1 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 Burns as a boy’s name, US Babies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. 0 0.03 0.05 0.08 0.1 1880 1920 1960 2000 Burns as a boy’s name, US Official rank (1 = most popular, log scale), 1880–2025, for US. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. #1 #10 #100 #1,000 #10K #100K 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 Burns as a boy’s name, US Official rank (1 = most popular, log scale), 1880–2025, for US. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. #1 #10 #100 #1,000 #10K #100K 1880 1920 1960 2000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Official rank; #1 at the top. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.Show the numbers Year US 2016 #10,744 (6) 1979 #6,056 (5) 1968 #3,673 (6) 1966 #3,249 (7) 1962 #3,640 (6) 1961 #4,065 (5) 1960 #4,038 (5) 1959 #3,290 (7) 1958 #3,275 (7) 1957 #3,024 (8) 1954 #3,176 (7) 1953 #2,531 (10) 1952 #2,875 (8) 1951 #3,066 (7) 1950 #1,879 (16)
The tide so far Peaked in the US in 1891 at #841. First recorded in the US in 1886.