Cassandre

Cassandre was the #2,282 girls' name in Canada in 2025 (9 babies).

Cassandre as a girl’s name

  • US
  • England & Wales
  • Canada
Cassandre as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.130.250.380.518801900192019401960198020002020Canada
Cassandre as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.130.250.380.51880192019602000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.
Show the numbers
YearUSEngland & WalesCanada
2025——#2,282 (9)
2024——#2,685 (7)
2023——#3,290 (5)
2022——#3,228 (5)
2021——#1,876 (11)
2020——#1,428 (16)
2019——#1,798 (12)
2018—#5,666 (3)#1,259 (19)
2017——#1,454 (16)
2016——#1,399 (17)
2015——#1,363 (17)
2014——#1,395 (17)
2013——#2,058 (10)
2012——#1,097 (23)
2011——#850 (31)

The tide so far

  • Peaked in Canada in 2005 at #533.
  • Falling over the last five years.
  • In the Canada records since the data begins in 1991.

How common is it?

about 1 in 17,000 baby girls in the published Canada list for 2025.

In a group of 1,000 children born that year, you would expect to meet fewer than 1. How we work this out.

Next year

On its recent trend, Cassandre is likely to keep falling in Canada in 2026: about 1 in 21,000 baby girls. Likely range 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 44,000.

Estimate, not an official figure. How we estimate.

Across Canada

ProvinceYearRankBabies
Quebec2025#5408

Cassandre (girls): rank in each province’s latest list. Only Quebec and Ontario publish full name lists; Ontario’s latest list is a year behind.

Spellings

Official statistics count each spelling separately, so we show them side by side rather than adding them up.

SpellingWhereSexLatest rankBabies
CassandreCanadaGirls#2,2829
CassandreEngland & WalesGirls—too few
CassandreUSGirls—too few