NameTides

Cattleya

Cattleya was the #1,211 girls' name in the US in 2025 (187 babies).

Cattleya as a girl’s name

  • US
  • England & Wales
  • Canada
Cattleya as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.050.10.150.218801900192019401960198020002020US
Cattleya as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.050.10.150.21880192019602000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.
Show the numbers
YearUSEngland & WalesCanada
2025#1,211 (187)——
2024#904 (293)—#3,383 (5)
2023#1,097 (224)#3,219 (7)—
2022#1,763 (117)#4,646 (4)#2,315 (8)
2021#1,544 (136)#3,519 (6)—
2020#1,649 (125)#5,493 (3)#2,591 (7)
2019#1,755 (117)#2,643 (9)#2,872 (6)
2018#1,799 (113)#5,666 (3)#2,344 (8)
2017#1,563 (140)#3,583 (6)—
2016#1,731 (121)#2,757 (9)#2,892 (6)
2015#1,622 (132)#4,103 (5)#2,599 (7)
2014#1,692 (124)#3,160 (7)#2,374 (8)
2013#1,684 (125)#3,160 (7)#1,913 (11)
2012#1,698 (123)#5,876 (3)#2,921 (6)
2011#12,153 (8)——

The tide so far

  • Peaked in the US in 2024 at #904.
  • Rising over the last five years.
  • First recorded in the US in 2011.

How common is it?

about 1 in 8,600 baby girls in the published US list for 2025.

In a group of 1,000 children born that year, you would expect to meet fewer than 1. How we work this out.

Next year

On its recent trend, Cattleya is likely to keep rising in the US in 2026: about 1 in 5,500 baby girls. Likely range 1 in 2,900 to 1 in 11,000.

Estimate, not an official figure. How we estimate.

Across the US

Cattleya by state, 2025Alaska: fewer than 5 babiesAKMaine: fewer than 5 babiesMEWisconsin: fewer than 5 babiesWIVermont: fewer than 5 babiesVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 babiesNHWashington: fewer than 5 babiesWAIdaho: fewer than 5 babiesIDMontana: fewer than 5 babiesMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 babiesNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 babiesMNIllinois: #1,014ILMichigan: fewer than 5 babiesMINew York: #1,418NYMassachusetts: #564MAOregon: fewer than 5 babiesORNevada: fewer than 5 babiesNVWyoming: fewer than 5 babiesWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 babiesSDIowa: fewer than 5 babiesIAIndiana: fewer than 5 babiesINOhio: #1,271OHPennsylvania: #1,392PANew Jersey: fewer than 5 babiesNJConnecticut: #540CTRhode Island: fewer than 5 babiesRICalifornia: #1,027CAUtah: fewer than 5 babiesUTColorado: fewer than 5 babiesCONebraska: fewer than 5 babiesNEMissouri: fewer than 5 babiesMOKentucky: fewer than 5 babiesKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 babiesWVVirginia: fewer than 5 babiesVAMaryland: fewer than 5 babiesMDDelaware: fewer than 5 babiesDEArizona: #578AZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 babiesNMKansas: fewer than 5 babiesKSArkansas: fewer than 5 babiesARTennessee: fewer than 5 babiesTNNorth Carolina: #1,437NCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 babiesSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 babiesDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 babiesOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 babiesLAMississippi: fewer than 5 babiesMSAlabama: fewer than 5 babiesALGeorgia: #1,358GAHawaii: fewer than 5 babiesHITexas: #1,062TXFlorida: #796FL
Cattleya (girls) rank in each state, 2025. Hatched states recorded fewer than 5 babies.
  • #1–10
  • #11–50
  • #51–100
  • #101–500
  • below #500

Spellings

Official statistics count each spelling separately, so we show them side by side rather than adding them up.

SpellingWhereSexLatest rankBabies
CattleyaCanadaGirls—too few
CattleyaEngland & WalesGirls—too few
CattleyaNorthern IrelandGirls—too few
CattleyaUSGirls#1,211187