Corinne

Corinne was the #999 girls' name in the US in 2025 (253 babies), and #4,867 in England & Wales.

Corinne as a girl’s name

  • US
  • England & Wales
  • Scotland
  • Northern Ireland
  • Ireland
  • Canada
Corinne as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Ireland, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Ireland, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.250.50.75118801900192019401960198020002020USEngland & Wales
Corinne as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Ireland, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Ireland, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.250.50.7511880192019602000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.
Show the numbers
YearUSEngland & WalesScotlandNorthern IrelandIrelandCanada
2025#999 (253)#4,867 (4)————
2024#1,086 (227)#3,696 (6)———#2,259 (9)
2023#1,037 (244)#4,710 (4)———#2,027 (10)
2022#1,073 (234)#3,971 (5)———#2,315 (8)
2021#1,029 (246)#3,192 (7)———#2,185 (9)
2020#958 (266)#2,615 (9)———#1,662 (13)
2019#890 (300)#2,170 (12)———#1,798 (12)
2018#796 (342)#1,977 (14)———#1,639 (13)
2017#825 (330)#1,911 (15)———#1,506 (15)
2016#806 (354)#3,609 (6)———#1,785 (12)
2015#732 (388)#2,705 (9)———#1,157 (21)
2014#736 (382)#2,862 (8)———#972 (27)
2013#739 (368)#2,649 (9)———#972 (27)
2012#766 (360)#2,338 (11)———#1,194 (21)
2011#797 (340)#3,549 (6)———#1,021 (25)

The tide so far

  • Peaked in the US in 1926 at #249.
  • Holding steady over the last five years.
  • In the US records since the data begins in 1880.

How common is it?

about 1 in 6,400 baby girls in the published US list for 2025.

In a group of 1,000 children born that year, you would expect to meet fewer than 1. How we work this out.

How common, country by country

WhereSexLatest yearShareVerdict
USGirls2025about 1 in 6,400uncommon
England & WalesGirls2025about 1 in 63,000rare

Next year

On its recent trend, Corinne is likely to hold steady in the US in 2026: about 1 in 6,600 baby girls. Likely range 1 in 6,000 to 1 in 7,300.

Estimate, not an official figure. How we estimate.

Across the US

Corinne by state, 2025Alaska: fewer than 5 babiesAKMaine: fewer than 5 babiesMEWisconsin: fewer than 5 babiesWIVermont: fewer than 5 babiesVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 babiesNHWashington: #732WAIdaho: fewer than 5 babiesIDMontana: fewer than 5 babiesMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 babiesNDMinnesota: #731MNIllinois: #709ILMichigan: #863MINew York: #1,312NYMassachusetts: #682MAOregon: fewer than 5 babiesORNevada: fewer than 5 babiesNVWyoming: fewer than 5 babiesWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 babiesSDIowa: #492IAIndiana: #815INOhio: #878OHPennsylvania: #871PANew Jersey: #846NJConnecticut: fewer than 5 babiesCTRhode Island: fewer than 5 babiesRICalifornia: #1,651CAUtah: fewer than 5 babiesUTColorado: #789CONebraska: fewer than 5 babiesNEMissouri: #589MOKentucky: fewer than 5 babiesKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 babiesWVVirginia: #843VAMaryland: #511MDDelaware: fewer than 5 babiesDEArizona: #1,040AZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 babiesNMKansas: #578KSArkansas: fewer than 5 babiesARTennessee: #1,127TNNorth Carolina: #834NCSouth Carolina: #688SCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 babiesDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 babiesOKLouisiana: #534LAMississippi: fewer than 5 babiesMSAlabama: fewer than 5 babiesALGeorgia: #1,358GAHawaii: fewer than 5 babiesHITexas: #1,224TXFlorida: #1,545FL
Corinne (girls) rank in each state, 2025. Hatched states recorded fewer than 5 babies.
  • #1–10
  • #11–50
  • #51–100
  • #101–500
  • below #500

Spellings

Official statistics count each spelling separately, so we show them side by side rather than adding them up.

SpellingWhereSexLatest rankBabies
CorinneCanadaGirls—too few
CorinneEngland & WalesGirls#4,8674
CorinneIrelandGirls—too few
CorinneNorthern IrelandGirls—too few
CorinneScotlandGirls—too few
CorinneUSGirls#999253
CorinneUSBoys—too few