Curtiss peaked in the US in 1935 at #702, and is too rare now to appear in the latest official lists.
Curtiss as a boy’s name Share of babies Rank
Curtiss as a boy’s name, US, England & Wales Babies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. 0 0.03 0.05 0.08 0.1 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 Curtiss as a boy’s name, US, England & Wales Babies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. 0 0.03 0.05 0.08 0.1 1880 1920 1960 2000 Curtiss as a boy’s name, US, England & Wales Official rank (1 = most popular, log scale), 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. #1 #10 #100 #1,000 #10K #100K 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 Curtiss as a boy’s name, US, England & Wales Official rank (1 = most popular, log scale), 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. #1 #10 #100 #1,000 #10K #100K 1880 1920 1960 2000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Official rank; #1 at the top. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.Show the numbers Year US England & Wales 2024 #12,349 (5) — 2020 #12,022 (5) — 2019 #10,803 (6) — 2017 #12,246 (5) — 2014 #7,048 (11) — 2013 #8,789 (8) — 2012 #9,709 (7) — 2011 #10,808 (6) — 2010 #6,036 (14) — 2009 #6,436 (13) — 2008 #7,187 (11) — 2006 #10,662 (6) — 2005 #9,115 (7) — 2004 #6,976 (10) — 2003 #6,715 (10) —
The tide so far Peaked in the US in 1935 at #702. First recorded in the US in 1896.