NameTides

Deep

Deep peaked in the US in 2000 at #2,993, and is too rare now to appear in the latest official lists.

Deep as a boy’s name

  • US
  • England & Wales
  • Canada
Deep as a boy’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.010.030.040.0518801900192019401960198020002020
Deep as a boy’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.010.030.040.051880192019602000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.
Show the numbers
YearUSEngland & WalesCanada
2024—#3,689 (5)—
2021—#3,990 (4)—
2020—#3,334 (5)—
2017—#3,996 (4)—
2016—#2,556 (8)—
2015#8,744 (8)#3,004 (6)—
2014#9,642 (7)——
2013#10,728 (6)#4,685 (3)—
2012#9,709 (7)#3,987 (4)#2,158 (7)
2011#8,079 (9)#2,613 (7)—
2010#8,139 (9)#2,400 (8)—
2009#7,236 (11)#2,837 (6)#2,625 (5)
2008#9,871 (7)#3,158 (5)—
2007#5,901 (14)#4,333 (3)#2,162 (6)
2006#5,525 (15)#1,892 (9)—

The tide so far

  • Peaked in the US in 2000 at #2,993.
  • First recorded in the US in 1988.

Spellings

Official statistics count each spelling separately, so we show them side by side rather than adding them up.

SpellingWhereSexLatest rankBabies
DeepCanadaBoys—too few
DeepEngland & WalesBoys—too few
DeepUSBoys—too few