Dima

Dima was the #7,885 girls' name in the US in 2025 (13 babies), and #3,333 in England & Wales and #3,044 in Canada.

Dima as a girl’s name

  • US
  • England & Wales
  • Canada
Dima as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.030.050.080.118801900192019401960198020002020CanadaEngland & WalesUS
Dima as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.030.050.080.11880192019602000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.
Show the numbers
YearUSEngland & WalesCanada
2025#7,885 (13)#3,333 (7)#3,044 (6)
2024#6,642 (17)#4,844 (4)#3,383 (5)
2023#11,169 (8)#2,689 (9)—
2022#8,542 (12)#2,889 (8)#3,228 (5)
2021#6,174 (19)#4,634 (4)#2,616 (7)
2020#6,325 (18)#3,117 (7)#3,251 (5)
2019#7,342 (15)#3,541 (6)—
2018#6,010 (20)#2,674 (9)#2,587 (7)
2017#5,661 (22)#2,502 (10)—
2016#5,130 (26)#3,214 (7)#2,383 (8)
2015#6,977 (17)#4,103 (5)#3,286 (5)
2014#7,636 (15)#4,684 (4)#3,316 (5)
2013#7,372 (16)#4,739 (4)—
2012#7,804 (15)#3,681 (6)#2,338 (8)
2011#9,150 (12)#2,150 (12)#3,310 (5)

Dima as a boy’s name

  • US
  • England & Wales
Dima as a boy’s name, US, England & WalesBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.010.030.040.0518801900192019401960198020002020
Dima as a boy’s name, US, England & WalesBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.010.030.040.051880192019602000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.
Show the numbers
YearUSEngland & Wales
2024#10,938 (6)#3,689 (5)
2023#12,239 (5)#1,907 (12)
2022—#3,450 (5)
2021—#3,451 (5)
2020—#4,608 (3)
2019—#3,013 (6)
2018#8,819 (8)#4,749 (3)
2017—#4,812 (3)
2013#12,136 (5)—
2012#12,274 (5)—
2011#8,079 (9)—
2009#9,864 (7)—
2007#8,915 (8)—
2005#11,472 (5)—
2002#9,392 (6)—

The tide so far

  • Peaked in the US in 2016 at #5,130.
  • Falling over the last five years.
  • First recorded in the US in 1983.
  • In 2024, 74% of US babies named Dima were girls.

How common is it?

about 1 in 130,000 baby girls in the published US list for 2025.

In a group of 1,000 children born that year, you would expect to meet fewer than 1. How we work this out.

How common, country by country

WhereSexLatest yearShareVerdict
USGirls2025about 1 in 130,000rare
England & WalesGirls2025about 1 in 36,000rare
CanadaGirls2025about 1 in 25,000rare

Next year

On its recent trend, Dima is likely to keep falling in the US in 2026: about 1 in 140,000 baby girls. Likely range 1 in 68,000 to 1 in 300,000.

Estimate, not an official figure. How we estimate.

Spellings

Official statistics count each spelling separately, so we show them side by side rather than adding them up.

SpellingWhereSexLatest rankBabies
DimaCanadaGirls#3,0446
DimaEngland & WalesGirls#3,3337
DimaEngland & WalesBoys—too few
DimaUSGirls#7,88513
DimaUSBoys—too few