Elma was the #4,352 girls' name in the US in 2025 (32 babies), and #1,079 in England & Wales and #3,044 in Canada.
Elma as a girl’s name
US
England & Wales
Scotland
Ireland
Canada
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list.Official rank; #1 at the top. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.Show the numbers
Year
US
England & Wales
Scotland
Ireland
Canada
2025
#4,352 (32)
#1,079 (31)
#780 (3)
—
#3,044 (6)
2024
#4,560 (30)
#1,406 (23)
—
—
#1,949 (11)
2023
#5,390 (23)
#1,525 (20)
—
—
—
2022
#5,172 (25)
#2,488 (10)
—
—
#2,315 (8)
2021
#4,326 (32)
#2,341 (11)
—
—
—
2020
#6,325 (18)
#1,773 (16)
—
—
#2,163 (9)
2019
#4,909 (27)
#2,286 (11)
—
—
#3,266 (5)
2018
#4,357 (32)
#2,187 (12)
—
—
—
2017
#4,384 (32)
#2,341 (11)
—
—
#3,307 (5)
2016
#4,990 (27)
#3,609 (6)
—
—
#2,383 (8)
2015
#4,488 (31)
#3,615 (6)
—
—
—
2014
#5,025 (27)
#2,314 (11)
—
—
—
2013
#5,644 (23)
#3,536 (6)
—
—
#2,595 (7)
2012
#4,216 (35)
#2,969 (8)
—
—
#3,334 (5)
2011
#4,353 (33)
#3,185 (7)
—
—
#2,156 (9)
The tide so far
Peaked in the US in 1901 at #209.
Rising over the last five years.
In the US records since the data begins in 1880.
A comeback: it faded for decades and is rising again.
In 1957, 92% of US babies named Elma were girls.
How common is it?
about 1 in 50,000 baby girls in the published US list for 2025.
In a group of 1,000 children born that year, you would expect to meet fewer than 1. How we work this out.
How common, country by country
Where
Sex
Latest year
Share
Verdict
US
Girls
2025
about 1 in 50,000
rare
England & Wales
Girls
2025
about 1 in 8,200
uncommon
Scotland
Girls
2025
about 1 in 6,000
uncommon
Canada
Girls
2025
about 1 in 25,000
rare
Next year
On its recent trend, Elma is likely to keep falling in the US in 2026: about 1 in 54,000 baby girls. Likely range 1 in 37,000 to 1 in 78,000.