Eola peaked in the US in 1880 at #738, and is too rare now to appear in the latest official lists.
Eola as a girl’s name Share of babies Rank
Eola as a girl’s name, US Babies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. 0 0.03 0.05 0.08 0.1 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 Eola as a girl’s name, US Babies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. 0 0.03 0.05 0.08 0.1 1880 1920 1960 2000 Eola as a girl’s name, US Official rank (1 = most popular, log scale), 1880–2025, for US. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. #1 #10 #100 #1,000 #10K 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 Eola as a girl’s name, US Official rank (1 = most popular, log scale), 1880–2025, for US. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. #1 #10 #100 #1,000 #10K 1880 1920 1960 2000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Official rank; #1 at the top. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.Show the numbers Year US 1956 #5,325 (6) 1954 #5,753 (5) 1949 #4,673 (6) 1948 #4,651 (6) 1947 #4,345 (7) 1946 #4,417 (6) 1945 #4,556 (5) 1943 #3,249 (9) 1942 #3,194 (9) 1941 #3,252 (8) 1940 #4,349 (5) 1939 #2,922 (9) 1938 #2,340 (13) 1937 #2,317 (13) 1935 #2,731 (10)
The tide so far Peaked in the US in 1880 at #738. In the US records since the data begins in 1880.