Esmeralda

Esmeralda was the #373 girls' name in the US in 2025 (823 babies), and #872 in England & Wales and #1,177 in Canada.

Esmeralda as a girl’s name

  • US
  • England & Wales
  • Scotland
  • Ireland
  • Canada
Esmeralda as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, Scotland, Ireland, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Scotland, Ireland, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.511.5218801900192019401960198020002020USEngland & WalesCanada
Esmeralda as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, Scotland, Ireland, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Scotland, Ireland, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.511.521880192019602000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.
Show the numbers
YearUSEngland & WalesScotlandIrelandCanada
2025#373 (823)#872 (40)——#1,177 (22)
2024#350 (894)#1,262 (26)#638 (4)—#1,194 (21)
2023#342 (907)#941 (37)——#928 (28)
2022#371 (854)#910 (38)——#1,017 (25)
2021#450 (696)#1,069 (32)——#1,185 (21)
2020#394 (790)#1,044 (32)#636 (4)#700 (4)#2,591 (7)
2019#379 (825)#1,252 (26)———
2018#377 (832)#1,013 (35)——#1,741 (12)
2017#378 (821)#1,330 (25)——#2,041 (10)
2016#377 (869)#1,571 (20)——#1,280 (19)
2015#370 (883)#1,711 (17)——#1,427 (16)
2014#377 (867)#2,058 (13)——#2,617 (7)
2013#393 (786)#2,887 (8)——#1,599 (14)
2012#360 (882)#1,893 (15)——#1,904 (11)
2011#333 (946)#2,432 (10)———

The tide so far

  • Peaked in the US in 1998 at #133.
  • Holding steady over the last five years.
  • First recorded in the US in 1911.

How common is it?

about 1 in 2,000 baby girls in the published US list for 2025.

In a group of 1,000 children born that year, you would expect to meet about 1. How we work this out.

How common, country by country

WhereSexLatest yearShareVerdict
USGirls2025about 1 in 2,000uncommon
England & WalesGirls2025about 1 in 6,300uncommon
CanadaGirls2025about 1 in 6,800uncommon

Next year

On its recent trend, Esmeralda is likely to keep rising in the US in 2026: about 1 in 1,700 baby girls. Likely range 1 in 1,400 to 1 in 2,100.

Estimate, not an official figure. How we estimate.

Across the US

Esmeralda by state, 2025Alaska: fewer than 5 babiesAKMaine: fewer than 5 babiesMEWisconsin: #364WIVermont: fewer than 5 babiesVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 babiesNHWashington: #301WAIdaho: #351IDMontana: fewer than 5 babiesMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 babiesNDMinnesota: #597MNIllinois: #256ILMichigan: #787MINew York: #628NYMassachusetts: #624MAOregon: #429ORNevada: #108NVWyoming: fewer than 5 babiesWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 babiesSDIowa: #565IAIndiana: #542INOhio: #711OHPennsylvania: #813PANew Jersey: #499NJConnecticut: #393CTRhode Island: fewer than 5 babiesRICalifornia: #155CAUtah: #385UTColorado: #277CONebraska: #244NEMissouri: #926MOKentucky: #744KYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 babiesWVVirginia: #573VAMaryland: #651MDDelaware: fewer than 5 babiesDEArizona: #172AZNew Mexico: #296NMKansas: #324KSArkansas: fewer than 5 babiesARTennessee: #568TNNorth Carolina: #534NCSouth Carolina: #688SCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 babiesDCOklahoma: #619OKLouisiana: fewer than 5 babiesLAMississippi: fewer than 5 babiesMSAlabama: #633ALGeorgia: #470GAHawaii: fewer than 5 babiesHITexas: #267TXFlorida: #404FL
Esmeralda (girls) rank in each state, 2025. Hatched states recorded fewer than 5 babies.
  • #1–10
  • #11–50
  • #51–100
  • #101–500
  • below #500

Across Canada

ProvinceYearRankBabies
Quebec2025#7745
Ontario2024#1,5856

Esmeralda (girls): rank in each province’s latest list. Only Quebec and Ontario publish full name lists; Ontario’s latest list is a year behind.

Spellings

Official statistics count each spelling separately, so we show them side by side rather than adding them up.

SpellingWhereSexLatest rankBabies
EsmeraldaCanadaGirls#1,17722
EsmeraldaEngland & WalesGirls#87240
EsmeraldaIrelandGirls—too few
EsmeraldaNorthern IrelandGirls—too few
EsmeraldaScotlandGirls—too few
EsmeraldaUSGirls#373823
EsmeraldaUSBoys—too few