NameTides

Gagandeep

Gagandeep peaked in Canada in 1997 at #638, and is too rare now to appear in the latest official lists.

Gagandeep as a boy’s name

  • US
  • England & Wales
  • Canada
Gagandeep as a boy’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.050.10.150.218801900192019401960198020002020
Gagandeep as a boy’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.050.10.150.21880192019602000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.
Show the numbers
YearUSEngland & WalesCanada
2017—#4,812 (3)—
2014—#3,895 (4)—
2012—#3,416 (5)—
2011—#3,830 (4)—
2009—#3,744 (4)—
2008—#3,158 (5)—
2007#9,788 (7)#2,741 (6)#2,426 (5)
2006#10,662 (6)#3,385 (4)—
2005—#1,991 (8)#1,816 (7)
2004—#2,070 (7)—
2003#8,643 (7)#1,771 (8)#1,855 (6)
2002—#1,519 (9)#1,776 (6)
2001#7,536 (8)#1,949 (6)#1,056 (13)
2000#5,588 (12)#1,889 (6)#891 (16)
1999#5,656 (11)#1,850 (6)#779 (19)

Gagandeep as a girl’s name

  • US
  • England & Wales
  • Canada
Gagandeep as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.050.10.150.218801900192019401960198020002020
Gagandeep as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.050.10.150.21880192019602000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.
Show the numbers
YearUSEngland & WalesCanada
2008—#5,545 (3)—
2007—#5,201 (3)—
2006—#5,061 (3)#2,607 (6)
2005#9,452 (11)——
2003—#3,594 (4)#1,898 (8)
2002—#2,301 (7)#1,848 (8)
2001——#1,691 (9)
2000#15,031 (5)—#2,186 (6)
1999—#2,444 (6)#2,001 (7)
1998—#3,848 (3)#1,562 (10)
1997—#2,152 (7)#1,293 (13)
1996#9,581 (8)#3,126 (4)#931 (21)
1995#13,386 (5)—#1,298 (13)
1994#10,569 (7)—#1,231 (12)
1993#11,780 (6)—#972 (19)

The tide so far

  • Peaked in Canada in 1997 at #638.
  • In the Canada records since the data begins in 1991.
  • In 2000, 29% of US babies named Gagandeep were girls.

Spellings

Official statistics count each spelling separately, so we show them side by side rather than adding them up.

SpellingWhereSexLatest rankBabies
GagandeepCanadaGirls—too few
GagandeepCanadaBoys—too few
GagandeepEngland & WalesGirls—too few
GagandeepEngland & WalesBoys—too few
GagandeepUSGirls—too few
GagandeepUSBoys—too few