NameTides

Hung

Hung peaked in the US in 1982 at #957, and is too rare now to appear in the latest official lists.

Hung as a boy’s name

  • US
  • England & Wales
  • Canada
Hung as a boy’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.030.050.080.118801900192019401960198020002020
Hung as a boy’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.030.050.080.11880192019602000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.
Show the numbers
YearUSEngland & WalesCanada
2022#12,330 (5)——
2018#12,156 (5)——
2017#12,246 (5)——
2016#10,744 (6)——
2015#8,040 (9)——
2013#10,728 (6)——
2012#10,770 (6)——
2011#10,808 (6)——
2010#8,803 (8)——
2009#7,692 (10)——
2008#7,698 (10)——
2007#6,622 (12)——
2006#8,732 (8)——
2005#5,578 (14)——
2004#7,536 (9)#3,651 (3)—

The tide so far

  • Peaked in the US in 1982 at #957.
  • First recorded in the US in 1975.

Spellings

Official statistics count each spelling separately, so we show them side by side rather than adding them up.

SpellingWhereSexLatest rankBabies
HungCanadaBoys—too few
HungEngland & WalesBoys—too few
HungNorthern IrelandGirls—too few
HungUSBoys—too few