NameTides

Issabella

Issabella was the #3,517 girls' name in the US in 2025 (43 babies), and #3,333 in England & Wales.

Issabella as a girl’s name

  • US
  • England & Wales
  • Canada
Issabella as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.030.050.080.118801900192019401960198020002020England & WalesUS
Issabella as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.030.050.080.11880192019602000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.
Show the numbers
YearUSEngland & WalesCanada
2025#3,517 (43)#3,333 (7)—
2024#4,560 (30)——
2023#3,640 (42)#5,688 (3)—
2022#2,928 (57)#3,534 (6)—
2021#3,069 (53)#4,634 (4)—
2020#2,890 (56)#2,843 (8)—
2019#2,231 (82)——
2018#2,334 (78)#4,684 (4)—
2017#2,283 (81)#2,925 (8)—
2016#2,697 (64)#4,096 (5)#2,892 (6)
2015#2,590 (69)#4,103 (5)#2,891 (6)
2014#2,469 (73)#2,314 (11)—
2013#2,002 (97)#2,649 (9)—
2012#2,160 (87)#1,893 (15)—
2011#1,639 (131)#1,807 (15)#2,009 (10)

The tide so far

  • Peaked in the US in 2010 at #1,590.
  • Falling over the last five years.
  • First recorded in the US in 1994.

How common is it?

about 1 in 37,000 baby girls in the published US list for 2025.

In a group of 1,000 children born that year, you would expect to meet fewer than 1. How we work this out.

How common, country by country

WhereSexLatest yearShareVerdict
USGirls2025about 1 in 37,000rare
England & WalesGirls2025about 1 in 36,000rare

Next year

On its recent trend, Issabella is likely to keep falling in the US in 2026: about 1 in 49,000 baby girls. Likely range 1 in 32,000 to 1 in 74,000.

Estimate, not an official figure. How we estimate.

Across the US

Issabella by state, 2025Alaska: fewer than 5 babiesAKMaine: fewer than 5 babiesMEWisconsin: fewer than 5 babiesWIVermont: fewer than 5 babiesVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 babiesNHWashington: fewer than 5 babiesWAIdaho: fewer than 5 babiesIDMontana: fewer than 5 babiesMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 babiesNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 babiesMNIllinois: fewer than 5 babiesILMichigan: fewer than 5 babiesMINew York: fewer than 5 babiesNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 babiesMAOregon: fewer than 5 babiesORNevada: fewer than 5 babiesNVWyoming: fewer than 5 babiesWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 babiesSDIowa: fewer than 5 babiesIAIndiana: fewer than 5 babiesINOhio: fewer than 5 babiesOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 babiesPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 babiesNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 babiesCTRhode Island: fewer than 5 babiesRICalifornia: fewer than 5 babiesCAUtah: fewer than 5 babiesUTColorado: fewer than 5 babiesCONebraska: fewer than 5 babiesNEMissouri: fewer than 5 babiesMOKentucky: fewer than 5 babiesKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 babiesWVVirginia: fewer than 5 babiesVAMaryland: fewer than 5 babiesMDDelaware: fewer than 5 babiesDEArizona: fewer than 5 babiesAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 babiesNMKansas: fewer than 5 babiesKSArkansas: fewer than 5 babiesARTennessee: fewer than 5 babiesTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 babiesNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 babiesSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 babiesDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 babiesOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 babiesLAMississippi: fewer than 5 babiesMSAlabama: fewer than 5 babiesALGeorgia: fewer than 5 babiesGAHawaii: fewer than 5 babiesHITexas: #2,636TXFlorida: fewer than 5 babiesFL
Issabella (girls) rank in each state, 2025. Hatched states recorded fewer than 5 babies.
  • #1–10
  • #11–50
  • #51–100
  • #101–500
  • below #500

Spellings

Official statistics count each spelling separately, so we show them side by side rather than adding them up.

SpellingWhereSexLatest rankBabies
IssabellaCanadaGirls—too few
IssabellaEngland & WalesGirls#3,3337
IssabellaNorthern IrelandGirls—too few
IssabellaUSGirls#3,51743