NameTides

Loxley

Loxley was the #4,987 girls' name in the US in 2025 (26 babies), and #5,927 in England & Wales.

Loxley as a girl’s name

  • US
  • England & Wales
  • Canada
Loxley as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.030.050.080.118801900192019401960198020002020USEngland & Wales
Loxley as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.030.050.080.11880192019602000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.
Show the numbers
YearUSEngland & WalesCanada
2025#4,987 (26)#5,927 (3)—
2024#4,294 (33)#5,892 (3)—
2023#4,454 (31)—#2,900 (6)
2022#5,309 (24)#3,149 (7)—
2021#3,297 (48)#5,581 (3)#2,377 (8)
2020#3,546 (42)#5,493 (3)#3,251 (5)
2019#3,272 (48)#4,686 (4)#2,374 (8)
2018#2,869 (58)—#2,344 (8)
2017#2,184 (87)—#2,179 (9)
2016#4,734 (29)——
2015#6,036 (21)——
2014#8,966 (12)——
2013#7,748 (15)——
2011#12,153 (8)——
2010#14,959 (6)——

Loxley as a boy’s name

  • US
  • England & Wales
  • Canada
Loxley as a boy’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.030.050.080.118801900192019401960198020002020England & Wales
Loxley as a boy’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.030.050.080.11880192019602000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.
Show the numbers
YearUSEngland & WalesCanada
2025—#2,133 (11)—
2024#8,987 (8)#1,675 (15)—
2023#7,289 (11)#1,363 (19)—
2022#6,479 (13)#2,166 (10)—
2021#8,825 (8)#1,391 (18)—
2020#6,620 (12)#1,379 (18)—
2019#7,173 (11)#1,083 (25)#2,756 (5)
2018#3,793 (28)#1,194 (22)—
2017#3,889 (27)#1,146 (24)#1,852 (9)
2016—#3,079 (6)—
2015#10,644 (6)#3,373 (5)—
2014—#2,964 (6)—
2013—#3,822 (4)—
2012—#4,805 (3)—
2011#7,502 (10)——

The tide so far

  • Peaked in the US in 2017 at #2,184.
  • Falling over the last five years.
  • First recorded in the US in 2010.
  • In 2024, 81% of US babies named Loxley were girls.

How common is it?

about 1 in 63,000 baby girls in the published US list for 2025.

In a group of 1,000 children born that year, you would expect to meet fewer than 1. How we work this out.

How common, country by country

WhereSexLatest yearShareVerdict
USGirls2025about 1 in 63,000rare
England & WalesGirls2025about 1 in 83,000rare
England & WalesBoys2025about 1 in 25,000rare

Next year

On its recent trend, Loxley is likely to keep falling in the US in 2026: about 1 in 68,000 baby girls. Likely range 1 in 42,000 to 1 in 110,000.

Estimate, not an official figure. How we estimate.

Across the US

Loxley by state, 2025Alaska: fewer than 5 babiesAKMaine: fewer than 5 babiesMEWisconsin: fewer than 5 babiesWIVermont: fewer than 5 babiesVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 babiesNHWashington: fewer than 5 babiesWAIdaho: fewer than 5 babiesIDMontana: fewer than 5 babiesMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 babiesNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 babiesMNIllinois: fewer than 5 babiesILMichigan: fewer than 5 babiesMINew York: fewer than 5 babiesNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 babiesMAOregon: fewer than 5 babiesORNevada: fewer than 5 babiesNVWyoming: fewer than 5 babiesWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 babiesSDIowa: fewer than 5 babiesIAIndiana: fewer than 5 babiesINOhio: fewer than 5 babiesOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 babiesPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 babiesNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 babiesCTRhode Island: fewer than 5 babiesRICalifornia: fewer than 5 babiesCAUtah: fewer than 5 babiesUTColorado: fewer than 5 babiesCONebraska: fewer than 5 babiesNEMissouri: fewer than 5 babiesMOKentucky: fewer than 5 babiesKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 babiesWVVirginia: fewer than 5 babiesVAMaryland: fewer than 5 babiesMDDelaware: fewer than 5 babiesDEArizona: fewer than 5 babiesAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 babiesNMKansas: fewer than 5 babiesKSArkansas: fewer than 5 babiesARTennessee: fewer than 5 babiesTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 babiesNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 babiesSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 babiesDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 babiesOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 babiesLAMississippi: fewer than 5 babiesMSAlabama: fewer than 5 babiesALGeorgia: fewer than 5 babiesGAHawaii: fewer than 5 babiesHITexas: #3,285TXFlorida: fewer than 5 babiesFL
Loxley (girls) rank in each state, 2025. Hatched states recorded fewer than 5 babies.
  • #1–10
  • #11–50
  • #51–100
  • #101–500
  • below #500

Spellings

Official statistics count each spelling separately, so we show them side by side rather than adding them up.

SpellingWhereSexLatest rankBabies
LoxleyCanadaGirls—too few
LoxleyCanadaBoys—too few
LoxleyEngland & WalesGirls#5,9273
LoxleyEngland & WalesBoys#2,13311
LoxleyNorthern IrelandGirls—too few
LoxleyNorthern IrelandBoys—too few
LoxleyUSGirls#4,98726
LoxleyUSBoys—too few