NameTides

Lucah

Lucah was the #3,240 boys' name in the US in 2025 (36 babies), and #2,952 in England & Wales.

Lucah as a boy’s name

  • US
  • England & Wales
  • Canada
Lucah as a boy’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.010.030.040.0518801900192019401960198020002020England & WalesUS
Lucah as a boy’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.010.030.040.051880192019602000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.
Show the numbers
YearUSEngland & WalesCanada
2025#3,240 (36)#2,952 (7)—
2024#3,001 (41)#2,922 (7)—
2023#2,769 (46)#4,992 (3)—
2022#2,269 (63)#2,321 (9)—
2021#2,225 (63)#4,789 (3)#2,260 (7)
2020#1,895 (78)#2,960 (6)—
2019#2,042 (71)#4,702 (3)#2,440 (6)
2018#3,793 (28)#3,959 (4)—
2017#4,105 (25)#4,812 (3)#2,762 (5)
2016#3,524 (31)#4,810 (3)#2,718 (5)
2015#4,890 (19)#3,908 (4)—
2014#4,866 (19)#3,362 (5)—
2013#4,621 (20)#4,685 (3)—
2012#5,482 (16)—#1,971 (8)
2011#7,009 (11)#4,647 (3)—

The tide so far

  • Peaked in the US in 2020 at #1,895.
  • Falling over the last five years.
  • First recorded in the US in 2004.

How common is it?

about 1 in 48,000 baby boys in the published US list for 2025.

In a group of 1,000 children born that year, you would expect to meet fewer than 1. How we work this out.

How common, country by country

WhereSexLatest yearShareVerdict
USBoys2025about 1 in 48,000rare
England & WalesBoys2025about 1 in 38,000rare

Next year

On its recent trend, Lucah is likely to keep falling in the US in 2026: about 1 in 55,000 baby boys. Likely range 1 in 49,000 to 1 in 63,000.

Estimate, not an official figure. How we estimate.

Across the US

Lucah by state, 2025Alaska: fewer than 5 babiesAKMaine: fewer than 5 babiesMEWisconsin: fewer than 5 babiesWIVermont: fewer than 5 babiesVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 babiesNHWashington: fewer than 5 babiesWAIdaho: fewer than 5 babiesIDMontana: fewer than 5 babiesMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 babiesNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 babiesMNIllinois: fewer than 5 babiesILMichigan: fewer than 5 babiesMINew York: fewer than 5 babiesNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 babiesMAOregon: fewer than 5 babiesORNevada: fewer than 5 babiesNVWyoming: fewer than 5 babiesWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 babiesSDIowa: fewer than 5 babiesIAIndiana: fewer than 5 babiesINOhio: fewer than 5 babiesOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 babiesPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 babiesNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 babiesCTRhode Island: fewer than 5 babiesRICalifornia: #2,203CAUtah: fewer than 5 babiesUTColorado: fewer than 5 babiesCONebraska: fewer than 5 babiesNEMissouri: fewer than 5 babiesMOKentucky: fewer than 5 babiesKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 babiesWVVirginia: fewer than 5 babiesVAMaryland: fewer than 5 babiesMDDelaware: fewer than 5 babiesDEArizona: fewer than 5 babiesAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 babiesNMKansas: fewer than 5 babiesKSArkansas: fewer than 5 babiesARTennessee: fewer than 5 babiesTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 babiesNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 babiesSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 babiesDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 babiesOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 babiesLAMississippi: fewer than 5 babiesMSAlabama: fewer than 5 babiesALGeorgia: fewer than 5 babiesGAHawaii: fewer than 5 babiesHITexas: #2,080TXFlorida: fewer than 5 babiesFL
Lucah (boys) rank in each state, 2025. Hatched states recorded fewer than 5 babies.
  • #1–10
  • #11–50
  • #51–100
  • #101–500
  • below #500

Spellings

Official statistics count each spelling separately, so we show them side by side rather than adding them up.

SpellingWhereSexLatest rankBabies
LucahCanadaBoys—too few
LucahEngland & WalesBoys#2,9527
LucahNorthern IrelandBoys—too few
LucahUSBoys#3,24036