Lum peaked in the US in 1884 at #450, and is too rare now to appear in the latest official lists.
Lum as a boy’s name Share of babies Rank
Lum as a boy’s name, US Babies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 Lum as a boy’s name, US Babies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 1880 1920 1960 2000 Lum as a boy’s name, US Official rank (1 = most popular, log scale), 1880–2025, for US. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. #1 #10 #100 #1,000 #10K 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 Lum as a boy’s name, US Official rank (1 = most popular, log scale), 1880–2025, for US. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. #1 #10 #100 #1,000 #10K 1880 1920 1960 2000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Official rank; #1 at the top. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.Show the numbers Year US 1961 #4,065 (5) 1958 #3,559 (6) 1955 #3,886 (5) 1952 #3,734 (5) 1950 #3,329 (6) 1949 #3,019 (7) 1947 #2,356 (11) 1946 #2,919 (7) 1944 #3,430 (5) 1940 #3,130 (6) 1939 #3,113 (6) 1937 #2,479 (9) 1936 #3,549 (5) 1933 #3,268 (6) 1932 #2,313 (11)
The tide so far Peaked in the US in 1884 at #450. In the US records since the data begins in 1880.