Makenzie

Makenzie was the #700 girls' name in the US in 2025 (406 babies), and #1,495 in Canada.

Makenzie as a girl’s name

  • US
  • England & Wales
  • Scotland
  • Northern Ireland
  • Ireland
  • Canada
Makenzie as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Ireland, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Ireland, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.511.5218801900192019401960198020002020USCanada
Makenzie as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Ireland, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Ireland, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.511.521880192019602000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.
Show the numbers
YearUSEngland & WalesScotlandNorthern IrelandIrelandCanada
2025#700 (406)————#1,495 (16)
2024#636 (464)————#1,710 (13)
2023#535 (566)————#1,774 (12)
2022#509 (619)————#1,313 (18)
2021#430 (734)————#1,153 (22)
2020#345 (898)————#1,359 (17)
2019#338 (949)————#1,231 (20)
2018#317 (1,034)————#953 (28)
2017#295 (1,099)———#734 (4)#1,179 (21)
2016#243 (1,309)#5,785 (3)———#867 (31)
2015#210 (1,550)———#896 (3)#820 (33)
2014#182 (1,781)#4,684 (4)——#876 (3)#671 (44)
2013#166 (1,938)————#581 (51)
2012#150 (2,127)#4,838 (4)——#768 (4)#660 (44)
2011#139 (2,210)#4,049 (5)———#502 (62)

The tide so far

  • Peaked in the US in 2011 at #139.
  • Falling over the last five years.
  • First recorded in the US in 1975.

How common is it?

about 1 in 4,000 baby girls in the published US list for 2025.

In a group of 1,000 children born that year, you would expect to meet fewer than 1. How we work this out.

How common, country by country

WhereSexLatest yearShareVerdict
USGirls2025about 1 in 4,000uncommon
CanadaGirls2025about 1 in 9,300uncommon

Next year

On its recent trend, Makenzie is likely to keep falling in the US in 2026: about 1 in 4,500 baby girls. Likely range 1 in 4,200 to 1 in 4,900.

Estimate, not an official figure. How we estimate.

Across the US

Makenzie by state, 2025Alaska: fewer than 5 babiesAKMaine: fewer than 5 babiesMEWisconsin: #564WIVermont: fewer than 5 babiesVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 babiesNHWashington: #1,046WAIdaho: fewer than 5 babiesIDMontana: fewer than 5 babiesMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 babiesNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 babiesMNIllinois: #748ILMichigan: #519MINew York: #758NYMassachusetts: #761MAOregon: fewer than 5 babiesORNevada: fewer than 5 babiesNVWyoming: fewer than 5 babiesWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 babiesSDIowa: fewer than 5 babiesIAIndiana: #577INOhio: #668OHPennsylvania: #487PANew Jersey: #618NJConnecticut: #540CTRhode Island: fewer than 5 babiesRICalifornia: #948CAUtah: #605UTColorado: fewer than 5 babiesCONebraska: fewer than 5 babiesNEMissouri: #926MOKentucky: fewer than 5 babiesKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 babiesWVVirginia: #520VAMaryland: #549MDDelaware: fewer than 5 babiesDEArizona: #676AZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 babiesNMKansas: fewer than 5 babiesKSArkansas: fewer than 5 babiesARTennessee: #532TNNorth Carolina: #581NCSouth Carolina: #347SCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 babiesDCOklahoma: #697OKLouisiana: #394LAMississippi: fewer than 5 babiesMSAlabama: #391ALGeorgia: #529GAHawaii: fewer than 5 babiesHITexas: #820TXFlorida: #714FL
Makenzie (girls) rank in each state, 2025. Hatched states recorded fewer than 5 babies.
  • #1–10
  • #11–50
  • #51–100
  • #101–500
  • below #500

Spellings

Official statistics count each spelling separately, so we show them side by side rather than adding them up.

SpellingWhereSexLatest rankBabies
MakenzieCanadaGirls#1,49516
MakenzieCanadaBoys—too few
MakenzieEngland & WalesGirls—too few
MakenzieEngland & WalesBoys—too few
MakenzieIrelandGirls—too few
MakenzieNorthern IrelandGirls—too few
MakenzieNorthern IrelandBoys—too few
MakenzieScotlandGirls—too few
MakenzieScotlandBoys—too few
MakenzieUSGirls#700406
MakenzieUSBoys—too few