Marks peaked in the US in 1916 at #3,177, and is too rare now to appear in the latest official lists.
Marks as a boy’s name Share of babies Rank
Marks as a boy’s name, US, England & Wales, Ireland Babies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Ireland. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 Marks as a boy’s name, US, England & Wales, Ireland Babies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Ireland. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 1880 1920 1960 2000 Marks as a boy’s name, US, England & Wales, Ireland Official rank (1 = most popular, log scale), 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Ireland. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. #1 #10 #100 #1,000 #10K 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 Marks as a boy’s name, US, England & Wales, Ireland Official rank (1 = most popular, log scale), 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Ireland. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. #1 #10 #100 #1,000 #10K 1880 1920 1960 2000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Official rank; #1 at the top. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.Show the numbers Year US England & Wales Ireland 2023 — #3,524 (5) — 2022 — #4,790 (3) — 2021 — #3,990 (4) — 2018 — #3,011 (6) — 2017 — #4,812 (3) — 2016 — #3,478 (5) #713 (3) 2014 — #3,895 (4) #609 (4) 2013 — #2,660 (7) — 2012 — — #718 (3) 2008 — — #529 (5) 1979 #5,355 (6) — — 1973 #5,101 (5) — — 1970 #4,230 (6) — — 1964 #4,039 (5) — — 1957 #2,631 (10) — —
The tide so far Peaked in the US in 1916 at #3,177. First recorded in the US in 1916.