Nanna peaked in the US in 1882 at #908, and is too rare now to appear in the latest official lists.
Nanna as a girl’s name Share of babies Rank
Nanna as a girl’s name, US Babies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. 0 0.01 0.03 0.04 0.05 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 Nanna as a girl’s name, US Babies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. 0 0.01 0.03 0.04 0.05 1880 1920 1960 2000 Nanna as a girl’s name, US Official rank (1 = most popular, log scale), 1880–2025, for US. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. #1 #10 #100 #1,000 #10K #100K 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 Nanna as a girl’s name, US Official rank (1 = most popular, log scale), 1880–2025, for US. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. #1 #10 #100 #1,000 #10K #100K 1880 1920 1960 2000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Official rank; #1 at the top. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.Show the numbers Year US 1994 #13,430 (5) 1992 #11,738 (6) 1972 #8,292 (5) 1949 #5,244 (5) 1948 #3,593 (9) 1947 #4,007 (8) 1942 #4,622 (5) 1941 #3,252 (8) 1940 #3,863 (6) 1935 #4,204 (5) 1934 #3,802 (6) 1931 #3,226 (8) 1930 #4,550 (5) 1929 #4,570 (5) 1928 #3,743 (7)
The tide so far Peaked in the US in 1882 at #908. First recorded in the US in 1882.