Nat peaked in the US in 1894 at #464, and is too rare now to appear in the latest official lists.
Nat as a boy’s name Share of babies Rank
Nat as a boy’s name, US, England & Wales Babies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 Nat as a boy’s name, US, England & Wales Babies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 1880 1920 1960 2000 Nat as a boy’s name, US, England & Wales Official rank (1 = most popular, log scale), 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. #1 #10 #100 #1,000 #10K #100K 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 Nat as a boy’s name, US, England & Wales Official rank (1 = most popular, log scale), 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. #1 #10 #100 #1,000 #10K #100K 1880 1920 1960 2000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Official rank; #1 at the top. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.Show the numbers Year US England & Wales 2023 #12,239 (5) — 2017 — #4,812 (3) 2008 — #4,432 (3) 2002 #10,667 (5) #3,225 (3) 1996 #7,971 (6) — 1992 #8,435 (5) — 1991 #7,271 (6) — 1987 #6,951 (5) — 1984 #4,552 (8) — 1982 #4,234 (9) — 1981 #5,468 (6) — 1980 #5,525 (6) — 1979 #3,810 (10) — 1976 #4,418 (7) — 1974 #2,799 (13) —
The tide so far Peaked in the US in 1894 at #464. In the US records since the data begins in 1880.