Raed

Raed was the #4,396 boys' name in the US in 2025 (23 babies), and #2,269 in England & Wales.

Raed as a boy’s name

  • US
  • England & Wales
  • Canada
Raed as a boy’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.030.050.080.118801900192019401960198020002020England & WalesUS
Raed as a boy’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.030.050.080.11880192019602000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.
Show the numbers
YearUSEngland & WalesCanada
2025#4,396 (23)#2,269 (10)—
2024#5,904 (15)#2,672 (8)#1,764 (11)
2023#6,897 (12)#4,992 (3)#2,921 (5)
2022#4,442 (23)#2,530 (8)#1,759 (10)
2021#7,587 (10)#2,730 (7)#2,061 (8)
2020#7,502 (10)#2,228 (9)#2,013 (8)
2019#7,173 (11)#3,013 (6)#1,634 (11)
2018#5,320 (17)#2,445 (8)—
2017#6,338 (13)#2,512 (8)—
2016#5,555 (16)#2,556 (8)#2,182 (7)
2015#5,999 (14)#3,908 (4)#2,139 (7)
2014#5,252 (17)#3,362 (5)—
2013#6,241 (13)#2,954 (6)#2,086 (7)
2012#6,306 (13)#2,721 (7)—
2011#5,945 (14)——

The tide so far

  • Peaked in the US in 2022 at #4,442.
  • Rising over the last five years.
  • First recorded in the US in 1975.

How common is it?

about 1 in 77,000 baby boys in the published US list for 2025.

In a group of 1,000 children born that year, you would expect to meet fewer than 1. How we work this out.

How common, country by country

WhereSexLatest yearShareVerdict
USBoys2025about 1 in 77,000rare
England & WalesBoys2025about 1 in 27,000rare

Next year

On its recent trend, Raed is likely to hold steady in the US in 2026: about 1 in 77,000 baby boys. Likely range 1 in 39,000 to 1 in 150,000.

Estimate, not an official figure. How we estimate.

Across the US

Raed by state, 2025Alaska: fewer than 5 babiesAKMaine: fewer than 5 babiesMEWisconsin: fewer than 5 babiesWIVermont: fewer than 5 babiesVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 babiesNHWashington: fewer than 5 babiesWAIdaho: fewer than 5 babiesIDMontana: fewer than 5 babiesMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 babiesNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 babiesMNIllinois: fewer than 5 babiesILMichigan: fewer than 5 babiesMINew York: #1,576NYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 babiesMAOregon: fewer than 5 babiesORNevada: fewer than 5 babiesNVWyoming: fewer than 5 babiesWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 babiesSDIowa: fewer than 5 babiesIAIndiana: fewer than 5 babiesINOhio: fewer than 5 babiesOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 babiesPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 babiesNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 babiesCTRhode Island: fewer than 5 babiesRICalifornia: fewer than 5 babiesCAUtah: fewer than 5 babiesUTColorado: fewer than 5 babiesCONebraska: fewer than 5 babiesNEMissouri: fewer than 5 babiesMOKentucky: fewer than 5 babiesKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 babiesWVVirginia: fewer than 5 babiesVAMaryland: fewer than 5 babiesMDDelaware: fewer than 5 babiesDEArizona: fewer than 5 babiesAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 babiesNMKansas: fewer than 5 babiesKSArkansas: fewer than 5 babiesARTennessee: fewer than 5 babiesTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 babiesNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 babiesSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 babiesDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 babiesOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 babiesLAMississippi: fewer than 5 babiesMSAlabama: fewer than 5 babiesALGeorgia: fewer than 5 babiesGAHawaii: fewer than 5 babiesHITexas: fewer than 5 babiesTXFlorida: fewer than 5 babiesFL
Raed (boys) rank in each state, 2025. Hatched states recorded fewer than 5 babies.
  • #1–10
  • #11–50
  • #51–100
  • #101–500
  • below #500

Spellings

Official statistics count each spelling separately, so we show them side by side rather than adding them up.

SpellingWhereSexLatest rankBabies
RaedCanadaBoys—too few
RaedEngland & WalesBoys#2,26910
RaedNorthern IrelandBoys—too few
RaedUSBoys#4,39623