NameTides

Ramandeep

Ramandeep peaked in Canada in 1995 at #790, and is too rare now to appear in the latest official lists.

Ramandeep as a girl’s name

  • US
  • England & Wales
  • Canada
Ramandeep as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.050.10.150.218801900192019401960198020002020
Ramandeep as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.050.10.150.21880192019602000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.
Show the numbers
YearUSEngland & WalesCanada
2014—#5,691 (3)—
2011—#5,785 (3)—
2009—#4,564 (4)—
2006—#5,061 (3)—
2005—#3,970 (4)—
2004—#2,278 (8)—
2003#12,408 (7)#1,996 (9)#2,353 (6)
2002—#3,409 (4)#2,051 (7)
2001—#2,466 (6)#1,691 (9)
2000—#2,746 (5)#1,976 (7)
1999#14,411 (5)#2,189 (7)#2,499 (5)
1998#9,260 (9)#1,571 (11)#1,450 (11)
1997#10,836 (7)#1,543 (11)#1,152 (15)
1996#11,807 (6)#1,755 (9)#1,177 (15)
1995#13,386 (5)—#790 (26)

Ramandeep as a boy’s name

  • US
  • England & Wales
  • Canada
Ramandeep as a boy’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.030.050.080.118801900192019401960198020002020
Ramandeep as a boy’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.030.050.080.11880192019602000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.
Show the numbers
YearUSEngland & WalesCanada
2004—#3,651 (3)—
2003—#2,857 (4)—
2001—#2,587 (4)—
2000—#3,036 (3)—
1999—#2,943 (3)#1,919 (5)
1998#8,479 (6)—#1,516 (7)
1997—#1,761 (6)#1,652 (6)
1996#9,015 (5)#1,337 (9)#1,513 (7)
1995——#1,224 (10)
1994——#1,232 (8)
1993——#1,428 (7)
1992——#1,685 (5)
1991#8,236 (5)—#1,493 (6)

The tide so far

  • Peaked in Canada in 1995 at #790.
  • In the Canada records since the data begins in 1991.

Spellings

Official statistics count each spelling separately, so we show them side by side rather than adding them up.

SpellingWhereSexLatest rankBabies
RamandeepCanadaGirls—too few
RamandeepCanadaBoys—too few
RamandeepEngland & WalesGirls—too few
RamandeepEngland & WalesBoys—too few
RamandeepUSGirls—too few
RamandeepUSBoys—too few