Reegan

Reegan was the #3,256 boys' name in England & Wales in 2025 (6 babies).

Reegan as a boy’s name

  • US
  • England & Wales
  • Scotland
  • Ireland
  • Canada
Reegan as a boy’s name, US, England & Wales, Scotland, Ireland, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Scotland, Ireland, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.130.250.380.518801900192019401960198020002020IrelandEngland & Wales
Reegan as a boy’s name, US, England & Wales, Scotland, Ireland, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Scotland, Ireland, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.130.250.380.51880192019602000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.
Show the numbers
YearUSEngland & WalesScotlandIrelandCanada
2025—#3,256 (6)—#829 (3)—
2023#12,239 (5)#1,907 (12)———
2022#12,330 (5)#1,179 (23)———
2021#10,799 (6)#2,125 (10)———
2020#7,034 (11)#1,273 (20)———
2019#7,643 (10)#1,030 (27)———
2018#5,770 (15)#985 (29)#433 (7)——
2017#7,546 (10)#1,068 (27)#733 (3)——
2016#5,555 (16)#774 (42)—#601 (4)#1,831 (9)
2015#7,491 (10)#740 (44)———
2014#4,538 (21)#680 (49)#587 (4)—#2,133 (7)
2013#4,804 (19)#684 (48)——#2,305 (6)
2012#4,533 (21)#559 (65)#434 (7)—#2,158 (7)
2011#5,200 (17)#602 (57)#364 (9)—#2,330 (6)
2010#5,741 (15)#609 (54)#426 (6)—#1,540 (11)

Reegan as a girl’s name

  • US
  • England & Wales
  • Scotland
  • Canada
Reegan as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, Scotland, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Scotland, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.050.10.150.218801900192019401960198020002020
Reegan as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, Scotland, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Scotland, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.050.10.150.21880192019602000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.
Show the numbers
YearUSEngland & WalesScotlandCanada
2023#13,462 (6)———
2022#10,383 (9)———
2021#7,250 (15)———
2020#7,559 (14)——#3,251 (5)
2019#4,909 (27)#4,001 (5)——
2018#5,619 (22)#2,901 (8)—#3,286 (5)
2017#4,922 (27)#3,583 (6)—#2,179 (9)
2016#3,588 (43)#5,785 (3)—#1,906 (11)
2015#3,299 (49)#5,730 (3)—#2,363 (8)
2014#3,848 (39)#4,003 (5)—#2,617 (7)
2013#4,336 (33)#5,742 (3)—#2,204 (9)
2012#2,356 (79)#4,171 (5)#815 (3)#1,904 (11)
2011#2,483 (73)#2,275 (11)—#2,009 (10)
2010#2,803 (62)#4,012 (5)—#1,532 (15)
2009#2,396 (80)#3,936 (5)—#1,493 (15)

The tide so far

  • Peaked in England & Wales in 2012 at #559.
  • Falling over the last five years.
  • In the England & Wales records since the data begins in 1996.
  • In 2023, 55% of US babies named Reegan were girls.

How common is it?

about 1 in 45,000 baby boys in the published England & Wales list for 2025.

In a group of 1,000 children born that year, you would expect to meet fewer than 1. How we work this out.

How common, country by country

WhereSexLatest yearShareVerdict
England & WalesBoys2025about 1 in 45,000rare
IrelandBoys2025about 1 in 7,900uncommon

Spellings

Official statistics count each spelling separately, so we show them side by side rather than adding them up.

SpellingWhereSexLatest rankBabies
ReeganCanadaGirls—too few
ReeganCanadaBoys—too few
ReeganEngland & WalesGirls—too few
ReeganEngland & WalesBoys#3,2566
ReeganIrelandBoys#8293
ReeganNorthern IrelandGirls—too few
ReeganNorthern IrelandBoys—too few
ReeganScotlandGirls—too few
ReeganScotlandBoys—too few
ReeganUSGirls—too few
ReeganUSBoys—too few