NameTides

Rhoda

Rhoda was the #3,296 girls' name in the US in 2025 (47 babies), and #2,788 in England & Wales and #2,282 in Canada.

Rhoda as a girl’s name

  • US
  • England & Wales
  • Scotland
  • Ireland
  • Canada
Rhoda as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, Scotland, Ireland, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Scotland, Ireland, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.250.50.75118801900192019401960198020002020CanadaEngland & WalesUS
Rhoda as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, Scotland, Ireland, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Scotland, Ireland, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.250.50.7511880192019602000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.
Show the numbers
YearUSEngland & WalesScotlandIrelandCanada
2025#3,296 (47)#2,788 (9)——#2,282 (9)
2024#2,819 (59)#4,844 (4)——#2,445 (8)
2023#3,329 (48)#3,599 (6)#749 (3)——
2022#3,171 (51)#2,889 (8)———
2021#2,929 (57)#5,581 (3)——#1,876 (11)
2020#3,338 (46)#2,615 (9)———
2019#3,388 (46)#4,001 (5)——#2,872 (6)
2018#3,346 (47)#3,985 (5)———
2017#3,552 (43)————
2016#3,139 (52)#4,763 (4)——#2,595 (7)
2015#3,346 (48)#2,496 (10)——#3,286 (5)
2014#3,719 (41)#2,862 (8)——#2,905 (6)
2013#3,918 (38)#3,160 (7)——#3,286 (5)
2012#4,387 (33)#3,285 (7)——#2,921 (6)
2011#4,466 (32)#3,549 (6)——#2,348 (8)

The tide so far

  • Peaked in the US in 1881 at #159.
  • Holding steady over the last five years.
  • In the US records since the data begins in 1880.

How common is it?

about 1 in 34,000 baby girls in the published US list for 2025.

In a group of 1,000 children born that year, you would expect to meet fewer than 1. How we work this out.

How common, country by country

WhereSexLatest yearShareVerdict
USGirls2025about 1 in 34,000rare
England & WalesGirls2025about 1 in 28,000rare
CanadaGirls2025about 1 in 17,000rare

Next year

On its recent trend, Rhoda is likely to hold steady in the US in 2026: about 1 in 33,000 baby girls. Likely range 1 in 27,000 to 1 in 41,000.

Estimate, not an official figure. How we estimate.

Across the US

Rhoda by state, 2025Alaska: fewer than 5 babiesAKMaine: fewer than 5 babiesMEWisconsin: fewer than 5 babiesWIVermont: fewer than 5 babiesVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 babiesNHWashington: fewer than 5 babiesWAIdaho: fewer than 5 babiesIDMontana: fewer than 5 babiesMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 babiesNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 babiesMNIllinois: fewer than 5 babiesILMichigan: fewer than 5 babiesMINew York: fewer than 5 babiesNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 babiesMAOregon: fewer than 5 babiesORNevada: fewer than 5 babiesNVWyoming: fewer than 5 babiesWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 babiesSDIowa: fewer than 5 babiesIAIndiana: fewer than 5 babiesINOhio: #1,271OHPennsylvania: #725PANew Jersey: fewer than 5 babiesNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 babiesCTRhode Island: fewer than 5 babiesRICalifornia: fewer than 5 babiesCAUtah: fewer than 5 babiesUTColorado: fewer than 5 babiesCONebraska: fewer than 5 babiesNEMissouri: fewer than 5 babiesMOKentucky: fewer than 5 babiesKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 babiesWVVirginia: fewer than 5 babiesVAMaryland: fewer than 5 babiesMDDelaware: fewer than 5 babiesDEArizona: fewer than 5 babiesAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 babiesNMKansas: fewer than 5 babiesKSArkansas: fewer than 5 babiesARTennessee: fewer than 5 babiesTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 babiesNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 babiesSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 babiesDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 babiesOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 babiesLAMississippi: fewer than 5 babiesMSAlabama: fewer than 5 babiesALGeorgia: fewer than 5 babiesGAHawaii: fewer than 5 babiesHITexas: fewer than 5 babiesTXFlorida: fewer than 5 babiesFL
Rhoda (girls) rank in each state, 2025. Hatched states recorded fewer than 5 babies.
  • #1–10
  • #11–50
  • #51–100
  • #101–500
  • below #500

Spellings

Official statistics count each spelling separately, so we show them side by side rather than adding them up.

SpellingWhereSexLatest rankBabies
RhodaCanadaGirls#2,2829
RhodaEngland & WalesGirls#2,7889
RhodaIrelandGirls—too few
RhodaNorthern IrelandGirls—too few
RhodaScotlandGirls—too few
RhodaUSGirls#3,29647
RhodaUSBoys—too few