Rube peaked in the US in 1896 at #592, and is too rare now to appear in the latest official lists.
Rube as a boy’s name Share of babies Rank
Rube as a boy’s name, US Babies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 Rube as a boy’s name, US Babies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 1880 1920 1960 2000 Rube as a boy’s name, US Official rank (1 = most popular, log scale), 1880–2025, for US. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. #1 #10 #100 #1,000 #10K 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 Rube as a boy’s name, US Official rank (1 = most popular, log scale), 1880–2025, for US. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. #1 #10 #100 #1,000 #10K 1880 1920 1960 2000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Official rank; #1 at the top. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.Show the numbers Year US 1973 #5,101 (5) 1966 #3,537 (6) 1957 #3,552 (6) 1956 #3,942 (5) 1955 #3,505 (6) 1952 #3,734 (5) 1949 #3,298 (6) 1948 #3,010 (7) 1945 #3,338 (5) 1944 #3,109 (6) 1943 #2,732 (8) 1942 #3,560 (5) 1940 #3,130 (6) 1938 #2,868 (7) 1937 #2,479 (9)
The tide so far Peaked in the US in 1896 at #592. In the US records since the data begins in 1880.