Rutha peaked in the US in 1932 at #748, and is too rare now to appear in the latest official lists.
Rutha as a girl’s name Share of babies Rank
Rutha as a girl’s name, US Babies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. 0 0.03 0.05 0.08 0.1 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 Rutha as a girl’s name, US Babies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. 0 0.03 0.05 0.08 0.1 1880 1920 1960 2000 Rutha as a girl’s name, US Official rank (1 = most popular, log scale), 1880–2025, for US. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. #1 #10 #100 #1,000 #10K 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 Rutha as a girl’s name, US Official rank (1 = most popular, log scale), 1880–2025, for US. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. #1 #10 #100 #1,000 #10K 1880 1920 1960 2000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Official rank; #1 at the top. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.Show the numbers Year US 1975 #7,984 (6) 1973 #5,580 (9) 1969 #5,974 (7) 1968 #5,642 (7) 1967 #3,656 (13) 1966 #4,198 (10) 1964 #3,000 (18) 1963 #3,336 (15) 1962 #3,161 (16) 1961 #2,957 (18) 1960 #2,432 (24) 1959 #2,152 (28) 1958 #2,663 (19) 1957 #2,168 (26) 1956 #1,897 (32)
The tide so far Peaked in the US in 1932 at #748. First recorded in the US in 1884.