Seanpaul peaked in the US in 2003 at #4,616, and is too rare now to appear in the latest official lists.
Seanpaul as a boy’s name Share of babies Rank
Seanpaul as a boy’s name, US, England & Wales, Scotland Babies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Scotland. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 Seanpaul as a boy’s name, US, England & Wales, Scotland Babies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Scotland. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 1880 1920 1960 2000 Seanpaul as a boy’s name, US, England & Wales, Scotland Official rank (1 = most popular, log scale), 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Scotland. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. #1 #10 #100 #1,000 #10K #100K 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 Seanpaul as a boy’s name, US, England & Wales, Scotland Official rank (1 = most popular, log scale), 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Scotland. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published. #1 #10 #100 #1,000 #10K #100K 1880 1920 1960 2000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Official rank; #1 at the top. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.Show the numbers Year US England & Wales Scotland 2014 — — #680 (3) 2011 — — #648 (3) 2010 #10,766 (6) — — 2008 #9,871 (7) — — 2007 #8,915 (8) — — 2006 #6,904 (11) — — 2005 #5,875 (13) #3,849 (3) — 2004 #5,007 (16) — — 2003 #4,616 (17) — — 2002 #6,522 (10) — — 2000 #6,839 (9) — — 1999 #7,139 (8) — — 1998 #9,631 (5) — — 1996 #7,136 (7) — — 1994 #8,800 (5) — —
The tide so far Peaked in the US in 2003 at #4,616. First recorded in the US in 1973.