NameTides

Sing

Sing peaked in the US in 1905 at #786, and is too rare now to appear in the latest official lists.

Sing as a boy’s name

  • US
  • England & Wales
Sing as a boy’s name, US, England & WalesBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.030.050.080.118801900192019401960198020002020
Sing as a boy’s name, US, England & WalesBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.030.050.080.11880192019602000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.
Show the numbers
YearUSEngland & Wales
2024—#5,120 (3)
2021#10,799 (6)—
2019—#4,702 (3)
1989#6,941 (6)—
1982#6,385 (5)—
1981#5,468 (6)—
1905#786 (10)—
1890#739 (8)—

Sing as a girl’s name

  • US
Sing as a girl’s name, USBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00000.0118801900192019401960198020002020
Sing as a girl’s name, USBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00000.011880192019602000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.
Show the numbers
YearUS
1980#10,392 (5)

The tide so far

  • Peaked in the US in 1905 at #786.
  • First recorded in the US in 1890.