NameTides

Sumayya

Sumayya was the #3,389 girls' name in the US in 2025 (45 babies), and #2,006 in England & Wales.

Sumayya as a girl’s name

  • US
  • England & Wales
  • Canada
Sumayya as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.050.10.150.218801900192019401960198020002020England & WalesUS
Sumayya as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.050.10.150.21880192019602000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.
Show the numbers
YearUSEngland & WalesCanada
2025#3,389 (45)#2,006 (14)—
2024#3,963 (37)#1,128 (30)—
2023#4,363 (32)#2,504 (10)#3,290 (5)
2022#5,309 (24)#1,621 (18)—
2021#6,174 (19)#2,201 (12)#2,893 (6)
2020#6,083 (19)#1,939 (14)—
2019#7,716 (14)#1,389 (22)—
2018#8,617 (12)#1,343 (24)—
2017#9,341 (11)#1,568 (20)#2,876 (6)
2016#8,875 (12)#1,370 (24)—
2015#8,931 (12)#942 (38)#3,286 (5)
2014#8,966 (12)#1,234 (27)#2,905 (6)
2013#7,031 (17)#1,587 (19)—
2012#11,257 (9)#1,583 (19)#2,921 (6)
2011#7,783 (15)#1,327 (23)#2,618 (7)

The tide so far

  • Peaked in the US in 2025 at #3,389.
  • Rising over the last five years.
  • First recorded in the US in 1990.

How common is it?

about 1 in 36,000 baby girls in the published US list for 2025.

In a group of 1,000 children born that year, you would expect to meet fewer than 1. How we work this out.

How common, country by country

WhereSexLatest yearShareVerdict
USGirls2025about 1 in 36,000rare
England & WalesGirls2025about 1 in 18,000rare

Next year

On its recent trend, Sumayya is likely to keep rising in the US in 2026: about 1 in 28,000 baby girls. Likely range 1 in 26,000 to 1 in 31,000.

Estimate, not an official figure. How we estimate.

Across the US

Sumayya by state, 2025Alaska: fewer than 5 babiesAKMaine: fewer than 5 babiesMEWisconsin: fewer than 5 babiesWIVermont: fewer than 5 babiesVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 babiesNHWashington: fewer than 5 babiesWAIdaho: fewer than 5 babiesIDMontana: fewer than 5 babiesMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 babiesNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 babiesMNIllinois: #1,405ILMichigan: fewer than 5 babiesMINew York: #1,087NYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 babiesMAOregon: fewer than 5 babiesORNevada: fewer than 5 babiesNVWyoming: fewer than 5 babiesWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 babiesSDIowa: fewer than 5 babiesIAIndiana: fewer than 5 babiesINOhio: fewer than 5 babiesOHPennsylvania: #1,015PANew Jersey: fewer than 5 babiesNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 babiesCTRhode Island: fewer than 5 babiesRICalifornia: fewer than 5 babiesCAUtah: fewer than 5 babiesUTColorado: fewer than 5 babiesCONebraska: fewer than 5 babiesNEMissouri: fewer than 5 babiesMOKentucky: fewer than 5 babiesKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 babiesWVVirginia: fewer than 5 babiesVAMaryland: fewer than 5 babiesMDDelaware: fewer than 5 babiesDEArizona: fewer than 5 babiesAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 babiesNMKansas: fewer than 5 babiesKSArkansas: fewer than 5 babiesARTennessee: fewer than 5 babiesTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 babiesNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 babiesSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 babiesDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 babiesOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 babiesLAMississippi: fewer than 5 babiesMSAlabama: fewer than 5 babiesALGeorgia: fewer than 5 babiesGAHawaii: fewer than 5 babiesHITexas: fewer than 5 babiesTXFlorida: fewer than 5 babiesFL
Sumayya (girls) rank in each state, 2025. Hatched states recorded fewer than 5 babies.
  • #1–10
  • #11–50
  • #51–100
  • #101–500
  • below #500

Spellings

Official statistics count each spelling separately, so we show them side by side rather than adding them up.

SpellingWhereSexLatest rankBabies
SumayyaCanadaGirls—too few
SumayyaEngland & WalesGirls#2,00614
SumayyaUSGirls#3,38945