Tiger

Tiger was the #3,658 boys' name in the US in 2025 (30 babies), and #2,440 in England & Wales.

Tiger as a boy’s name

  • US
  • England & Wales
  • Canada
Tiger as a boy’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.050.10.150.218801900192019401960198020002020England & WalesUS
Tiger as a boy’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.050.10.150.21880192019602000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.
Show the numbers
YearUSEngland & WalesCanada
2025#3,658 (30)#2,440 (9)—
2024#4,321 (24)#1,859 (13)—
2023#3,293 (36)#1,701 (14)—
2022#2,243 (64)#1,692 (14)—
2021#4,118 (25)#1,391 (18)—
2020#3,653 (29)#1,492 (16)—
2019#3,716 (29)#2,104 (10)—
2018#3,446 (32)#1,991 (11)—
2017#3,678 (29)#1,923 (12)—
2016#3,776 (28)#2,804 (7)—
2015#3,684 (29)#2,150 (10)—
2014#3,297 (33)#1,630 (14)—
2013#3,189 (34)#3,315 (5)#1,926 (8)
2012#3,894 (26)#2,270 (9)—
2011#3,885 (26)#2,194 (9)—

Tiger as a girl’s name

  • US
  • England & Wales
  • Canada
Tiger as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.030.050.080.118801900192019401960198020002020Canada
Tiger as a girl’s name, US, England & Wales, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, England & Wales, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.030.050.080.11880192019602000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.
Show the numbers
YearUSEngland & WalesCanada
2025——#3,478 (5)
2023—#4,057 (5)—
2022#10,383 (9)#3,971 (5)—
2019#13,799 (6)#2,869 (8)—
2018#12,464 (7)#3,518 (6)—
2017#15,902 (5)#3,583 (6)—
2016—#5,785 (3)—
2015—#3,615 (6)—
2014—#5,691 (3)—
2012—#3,285 (7)—
2011#14,824 (6)#4,049 (5)—
2010—#2,843 (8)—
2009—#3,422 (6)—
2008—#3,860 (5)—
2007—#4,294 (4)—

The tide so far

  • Peaked in the US in 2010 at #1,316.
  • Holding steady over the last five years.
  • First recorded in the US in 1962.
  • In 2022, 12% of US babies named Tiger were girls.

How common is it?

about 1 in 56,000 baby boys in the published US list for 2025.

In a group of 1,000 children born that year, you would expect to meet fewer than 1. How we work this out.

How common, country by country

WhereSexLatest yearShareVerdict
USBoys2025about 1 in 56,000rare
England & WalesBoys2025about 1 in 30,000rare
CanadaGirls2025about 1 in 30,000rare

Next year

On its recent trend, Tiger is likely to keep falling in the US in 2026: about 1 in 59,000 baby boys. Likely range 1 in 24,000 to 1 in 140,000.

Estimate, not an official figure. How we estimate.

Spellings

Official statistics count each spelling separately, so we show them side by side rather than adding them up.

SpellingWhereSexLatest rankBabies
TigerCanadaGirls#3,4785
TigerCanadaBoys—too few
TigerEngland & WalesGirls—too few
TigerEngland & WalesBoys#2,4409
TigerNorthern IrelandGirls—too few
TigerNorthern IrelandBoys—too few
TigerUSGirls—too few
TigerUSBoys#3,65830