NameTides

Tinsley

Tinsley was the #1,109 girls' name in the US in 2025 (213 babies).

Tinsley as a girl’s name

  • US
  • Canada
Tinsley as a girl’s name, US, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.130.250.380.518801900192019401960198020002020US
Tinsley as a girl’s name, US, CanadaBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US, Canada. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.130.250.380.51880192019602000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.
Show the numbers
YearUSCanada
2025#1,109 (213)—
2024#1,369 (166)—
2023#1,001 (254)#2,604 (7)
2022#915 (300)—
2021#900 (301)#2,893 (6)
2020#718 (388)#2,163 (9)
2019#805 (341)#2,374 (8)
2018#773 (353)#1,639 (13)
2017#838 (324)#3,307 (5)
2016#965 (280)—
2015#1,007 (266)—
2014#1,134 (221)—
2013#1,093 (224)#2,058 (10)
2012#1,188 (207)—
2011#1,061 (232)#2,899 (6)

The tide so far

  • Peaked in the US in 2020 at #718.
  • Falling over the last five years.
  • First recorded in the US in 1982.

How common is it?

about 1 in 7,500 baby girls in the published US list for 2025.

In a group of 1,000 children born that year, you would expect to meet fewer than 1. How we work this out.

Next year

On its recent trend, Tinsley is likely to keep falling in the US in 2026: about 1 in 9,700 baby girls. Likely range 1 in 6,900 to 1 in 14,000.

Estimate, not an official figure. How we estimate.

Across the US

Tinsley by state, 2025Alaska: fewer than 5 babiesAKMaine: fewer than 5 babiesMEWisconsin: fewer than 5 babiesWIVermont: fewer than 5 babiesVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 babiesNHWashington: fewer than 5 babiesWAIdaho: fewer than 5 babiesIDMontana: fewer than 5 babiesMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 babiesNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 babiesMNIllinois: #1,014ILMichigan: #863MINew York: fewer than 5 babiesNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 babiesMAOregon: fewer than 5 babiesORNevada: fewer than 5 babiesNVWyoming: fewer than 5 babiesWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 babiesSDIowa: fewer than 5 babiesIAIndiana: #815INOhio: fewer than 5 babiesOHPennsylvania: #1,392PANew Jersey: fewer than 5 babiesNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 babiesCTRhode Island: fewer than 5 babiesRICalifornia: #3,095CAUtah: fewer than 5 babiesUTColorado: fewer than 5 babiesCONebraska: fewer than 5 babiesNEMissouri: #516MOKentucky: #653KYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 babiesWVVirginia: #843VAMaryland: fewer than 5 babiesMDDelaware: fewer than 5 babiesDEArizona: fewer than 5 babiesAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 babiesNMKansas: fewer than 5 babiesKSArkansas: #301ARTennessee: #888TNNorth Carolina: #834NCSouth Carolina: #773SCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 babiesDCOklahoma: #483OKLouisiana: #597LAMississippi: fewer than 5 babiesMSAlabama: #574ALGeorgia: #581GAHawaii: fewer than 5 babiesHITexas: #1,190TXFlorida: #1,436FL
Tinsley (girls) rank in each state, 2025. Hatched states recorded fewer than 5 babies.
  • #1–10
  • #11–50
  • #51–100
  • #101–500
  • below #500

Spellings

Official statistics count each spelling separately, so we show them side by side rather than adding them up.

SpellingWhereSexLatest rankBabies
TinsleyCanadaGirls—too few
TinsleyUSGirls#1,109213
TinsleyUSBoys—too few