NameTides

Verle

Verle peaked in the US in 1908 at #825, and is too rare now to appear in the latest official lists.

Verle as a boy’s name

  • US
Verle as a boy’s name, USBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.030.050.080.118801900192019401960198020002020
Verle as a boy’s name, USBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.030.050.080.11880192019602000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.
Show the numbers
YearUS
1978#5,059 (6)
1970#3,521 (8)
1968#4,136 (5)
1967#3,966 (5)
1966#3,249 (7)
1965#3,537 (6)
1964#2,665 (10)
1963#2,300 (13)
1962#3,041 (8)
1961#3,097 (8)
1960#1,973 (17)
1959#3,037 (8)
1958#2,177 (14)
1957#1,791 (20)
1956#2,168 (14)

Verle as a girl’s name

  • US
Verle as a girl’s name, USBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.010.030.040.0518801900192019401960198020002020
Verle as a girl’s name, USBabies per 1,000 in the published list, 1880–2025, for US. Gaps mark years with too few babies to be published.00.010.030.040.051880192019602000
Babies per 1,000 of the same sex in each published list. Breaks in a line are years with too few babies to be published.
Show the numbers
YearUS
1948#5,243 (5)
1940#4,349 (5)
1938#3,450 (7)
1936#3,701 (6)
1935#3,156 (8)
1934#2,923 (9)
1933#2,275 (13)
1932#3,047 (9)
1931#2,972 (9)
1930#2,306 (14)
1929#2,301 (14)
1928#1,837 (21)
1927#2,552 (13)
1926#1,830 (22)
1925#1,946 (20)

The tide so far

  • Peaked in the US in 1908 at #825.
  • First recorded in the US in 1906.
  • In 1948, 21% of US babies named Verle were girls.